From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAD9C4338F for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 21:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0202B6137A for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 21:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234022AbhHOVcT (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Aug 2021 17:32:19 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:48436 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231671AbhHOV3Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Aug 2021 17:29:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20210815211304.790760545@linutronix.de> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1629062934; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: references:references; bh=MJbhoSWNuYj+bWle6aksdkFrxsJ6cTJTB/qdnCZsORI=; b=TttJjF2H6fUIn8MK6zkiM7Rd95SvbJzubvvhBzOedadin50NUl8LEq4/oNAQobXVllX36M 0EZ1A/M8HkZ0k6S67hYKVrdOA+pIHHVN//XT1c+hvEZyXvb2xyS0xBFJam2LDole8xQmHU GrDqxskT2JA5XVwArYIITksWavEqEwhiYXgT1BQi0Om7ZMNbSvw76NgeK+Y7l4WMKc81ZK hhVRzWQ9GEen+QEuKj0YNfkAEJa1MzvmpVu/IDhoTVUzti4e8OqEapoIXr1WoLIlEYhnCi cI8tpgNuuPJWCWBuGT9DpzNqNV5khhi6zzbfcEyz4Yxp0rkz2URqvLoonJg+cw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1629062934; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: references:references; bh=MJbhoSWNuYj+bWle6aksdkFrxsJ6cTJTB/qdnCZsORI=; b=e9r+UwQI+BvRdAGrysH1aiaLq7YndsxCbXqKxIDNeAlRvUSgrs1HzXBQQrmf+9oc9evy6r YBmCiJMX0rZLHUBw== From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Steven Rostedt , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Davidlohr Bueso , Mike Galbraith Subject: [patch V5 50/72] locking/ww_mutex: Implement rt_mutex accessors References: <20210815203225.710392609@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8-bit Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 23:28:53 +0200 (CEST) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Peter Zijlstra Provide the type defines and the helper inlines for rtmutex based ww_mutexes. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+) --- --- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h +++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +#ifndef WW_RT + #define MUTEX mutex #define MUTEX_WAITER mutex_waiter @@ -83,6 +85,82 @@ static inline void lockdep_assert_wait_l lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); } +#else /* WW_RT */ + +#define MUTEX rt_mutex +#define MUTEX_WAITER rt_mutex_waiter + +static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter * +__ww_waiter_first(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + struct rb_node *n = rb_first(&lock->rtmutex.waiters.rb_root); + if (!n) + return NULL; + return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry); +} + +static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter * +__ww_waiter_next(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *w) +{ + struct rb_node *n = rb_next(&w->tree_entry); + if (!n) + return NULL; + return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry); +} + +static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter * +__ww_waiter_prev(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *w) +{ + struct rb_node *n = rb_prev(&w->tree_entry); + if (!n) + return NULL; + return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry); +} + +static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter * +__ww_waiter_last(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + struct rb_node *n = rb_last(&lock->rtmutex.waiters.rb_root); + if (!n) + return NULL; + return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry); +} + +static inline void +__ww_waiter_add(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct rt_mutex_waiter *pos) +{ + /* RT unconditionally adds the waiter first and then removes it on error */ +} + +static inline struct task_struct * +__ww_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + return rt_mutex_owner(&lock->rtmutex); +} + +static inline bool +__ww_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + return rt_mutex_has_waiters(&lock->rtmutex); +} + +static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + raw_spin_lock(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock); +} + +static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock); +} + +static inline void lockdep_assert_wait_lock_held(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock); +} + +#endif /* WW_RT */ + /* * Wait-Die: * The newer transactions are killed when: @@ -169,7 +247,9 @@ static bool if (waiter->ww_ctx->acquired > 0 && __ww_ctx_stamp_after(waiter->ww_ctx, ww_ctx)) { +#ifndef WW_RT debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter); +#endif wake_up_process(waiter->task); }