linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, Tom Murphy <murphyt7@tcd.ie>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/7] dma-iommu: skip extra sync during unmap w/swiotlb
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 10:38:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210817013852.3222824-4-stevensd@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210817013852.3222824-1-stevensd@google.com>

From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>

Calling the iommu_dma_sync_*_for_cpu functions during unmap can cause
two copies out of the swiotlb buffer. Do the arch sync directly in
__iommu_dma_unmap_swiotlb instead to avoid this. This makes the call to
iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu for untrusted devices in iommu_dma_unmap_sg no
longer necessary, so move that invocation later in the function.

Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
index 8098ce593640..5dd2c517dbf5 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
@@ -504,6 +504,9 @@ static void __iommu_dma_unmap_swiotlb(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
 	if (WARN_ON(!phys))
 		return;
 
+	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) && !dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
+		arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(phys, size, dir);
+
 	__iommu_dma_unmap(dev, dma_addr, size);
 
 	if (unlikely(is_swiotlb_buffer(phys)))
@@ -853,8 +856,6 @@ static dma_addr_t iommu_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
 static void iommu_dma_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
 		size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
 {
-	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC))
-		iommu_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, dma_handle, size, dir);
 	__iommu_dma_unmap_swiotlb(dev, dma_handle, size, dir, attrs);
 }
 
@@ -1062,14 +1063,14 @@ static void iommu_dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
 	struct scatterlist *tmp;
 	int i;
 
-	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC))
-		iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(dev, sg, nents, dir);
-
 	if (dev_is_untrusted(dev)) {
 		iommu_dma_unmap_sg_swiotlb(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
 		return;
 	}
 
+	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC))
+		iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(dev, sg, nents, dir);
+
 	/*
 	 * The scatterlist segments are mapped into a single
 	 * contiguous IOVA allocation, so this is incredibly easy.
-- 
2.33.0.rc1.237.g0d66db33f3-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-17  1:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-17  1:38 [PATCH v6 0/7] Fixes for dma-iommu swiotlb bounce buffers David Stevens
2021-08-17  1:38 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] dma-iommu: fix sync_sg with swiotlb David Stevens
2021-08-17  1:38 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] dma-iommu: fix arch_sync_dma for map David Stevens
2021-08-19  8:59   ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-17  1:38 ` David Stevens [this message]
2021-08-19  8:59   ` [PATCH v6 3/7] dma-iommu: skip extra sync during unmap w/swiotlb Robin Murphy
2021-08-17  1:38 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] dma-iommu: fold _swiotlb helpers into callers David Stevens
2021-08-19  9:00   ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-17  1:38 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] dma-iommu: Check CONFIG_SWIOTLB more broadly David Stevens
2021-08-17  1:38 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] swiotlb: support aligned swiotlb buffers David Stevens
2021-08-17  1:38 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] dma-iommu: account for min_align_mask David Stevens
2021-08-19  9:03   ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-19 10:05     ` David Stevens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210817013852.3222824-4-stevensd@google.com \
    --to=stevensd@chromium.org \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=murphyt7@tcd.ie \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).