From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A9DC4338F for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32428610A3 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240264AbhHSPY4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:24:56 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59232 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240213AbhHSPYy (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:24:54 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79A9961075; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:24:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1629386658; bh=TbppuiKfS5RzFZDe5IM1WjypWyaTiBt6AKpbU01/Vjg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Li1FSwq9F5gEd2Ze4i6TyeATB5E6EALmBYJkB3hp6/FbRFZnlIDu4QQxy7DSOa7zp mGzAicpMuTnHyzL0tACFTBFfaRx71Mn1icTmxAkyHQVMDpUg7PcTVZYp8ic78/6TEn m9TfXqrLWDIBpGJ1+zG2cdenoIpnp8wYsYapEku7NnlJXCflgY2Vu8VypSPYZKILjF IVk1jBnwHu62qovVBjmH6g8ALcv7XkcLLrA7hHFuR5IXPchyC6KkqVzzRxwaAAY6Xj PpWumi0ETi95Qq1vYSTbkcofl9zbaIFhrYH7LE25WHuuJwb4axLFOkR8Yg02tAIhdL liOwL49KhITrQ== Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 16:23:53 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: kernel test robot Cc: Matti Vaittinen , Cristian Marussi , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [kbuild] drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c:531:8: warning: Excessive padding in 'struct bd718xx_regulator_data' (8 padding bytes, where 0 is optimal). Message-ID: <20210819152353.GN4177@sirena.org.uk> References: <202108172206.9cbgvI53-lkp@intel.com> <4dabc78a-f9ee-4e7d-8bf3-ea1c6cef8530@intel.com> <422ade1b-8e88-d6dc-ae4e-799e729932b7@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qi3SIpffvxS/TM8d" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <422ade1b-8e88-d6dc-ae4e-799e729932b7@intel.com> X-Cookie: She sells cshs by the cshore. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --qi3SIpffvxS/TM8d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:49:13PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Sorry for bothering, we'll ignore struct padding warnings next time. I think the warnings are useful, it's just that they're not important for all structs. If the struct was getting allocated a lot it could be pointing out an issue that makes a real difference. I'm not sure it s realistic for automation to figure it out for itself so it's better to send them even if they get ignored a lot. --qi3SIpffvxS/TM8d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmEed4kACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AhvAf/X8iA7lw+gQGPtcpDfsRnpdm/eSdg5czGHcPoYCB0EXpC78C9Ryea+yEm ZZpBB4cm+ZjOGpj/bV0vMFD7JKDofjXSN8E1GWyICUrOBj8wi6KVdYOOSdXzkwSj btley9wci3zSIAmsdTHj4sEY8YOc/iwg+ZXtAYCNh/ypLgiI5LVh65hjxLAqd+p3 3JmAvYEnMA9jU6ji2USYOhA/McjfQN0DM+exKww/KTlSToG6F766zFHz12ygmytV P7P+soQf1dpIQhmWH+goz1KxxzCsdWkTC0Rjyuo0EsO6MCJOg3feTgiQEOih2w96 nyHjnhDOBCW575mQv5lDw3zeyYV0Kw== =UtaG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qi3SIpffvxS/TM8d--