From: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] sched/fair: Add ancestors of unthrottled undecayed cfs_rq
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 19:50:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210819175034.4577-2-mkoutny@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210819175034.4577-1-mkoutny@suse.com>
Since commit a7b359fc6a37 ("sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to
list on unthrottle") we add cfs_rqs with no runnable tasks but not fully
decayed into the load (leaf) list. We may ignore adding some ancestors
and therefore breaking tmp_alone_branch invariant. This broke LTP test
cfs_bandwidth01 and it was partially fixed in commit fdaba61ef8a2
("sched/fair: Ensure that the CFS parent is added after unthrottling").
I noticed the named test still fails even with the fix (but with low
probability, 1 in ~1000 executions of the test). The reason is when
bailing out of unthrottle_cfs_rq early, we may miss adding ancestors of
the unthrottled cfs_rq, thus, not joining tmp_alone_branch properly.
Fix this by adding ancestors if we notice the unthrottled cfs_rq was
added to the load list.
Fixes: a7b359fc6a37 ("sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on unthrottle")
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 44c452072a1b..2c41a9007928 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4898,8 +4898,16 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
/* update hierarchical throttle state */
walk_tg_tree_from(cfs_rq->tg, tg_nop, tg_unthrottle_up, (void *)rq);
- if (!cfs_rq->load.weight)
+ if (!cfs_rq->load.weight) {
+ /* Nothing to run but something to decay? Complete the branch */
+ if (cfs_rq->on_list)
+ for_each_sched_entity(se) {
+ if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(group_cfs_rq(se)))
+ break;
+ }
+ assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq);
return;
+ }
task_delta = cfs_rq->h_nr_running;
idle_task_delta = cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running;
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-19 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-19 17:50 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] leaf_cfs_rq_list cleanups and fix Michal Koutný
2021-08-19 17:50 ` Michal Koutný [this message]
2021-09-09 13:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] sched/fair: Add ancestors of unthrottled undecayed cfs_rq Vincent Guittot
2021-09-10 11:35 ` Michal Koutný
2021-09-10 13:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-08-19 17:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] sched: Add group_se() helper Michal Koutný
2021-08-19 17:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] sched/fair: Rename leaf_list to more fitting load_list Michal Koutný
2021-09-21 19:06 ` Odin Ugedal
2021-08-19 17:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] sched/fair: Simplify load_cfs_rq_list maintenance Michal Koutný
2021-09-10 14:19 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-09-14 9:22 ` Michal Koutný
2021-09-14 9:45 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-09-15 12:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-09-15 18:59 ` Odin Ugedal
2021-09-21 19:21 ` Odin Ugedal
2021-09-21 21:40 ` Michal Koutný
2021-08-19 17:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] sched/fair: Simplify ancestor enqueue loops Michal Koutný
2021-09-09 14:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-09-10 11:35 ` Michal Koutný
2021-09-10 11:43 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210819175034.4577-2-mkoutny@suse.com \
--to=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ggherdovich@suse.cz \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=odin@uged.al \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).