From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>, Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Artem Kashkanov <artem.kashkanov@intel.com>,
Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>,
Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/15] perf: Track guest callbacks on a per-CPU basis
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:57:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210827005718.585190-6-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210827005718.585190-1-seanjc@google.com>
Use a per-CPU pointer to track perf's guest callbacks so that KVM can set
the callbacks more precisely and avoid a lurking NULL pointer dereference.
On x86, KVM supports being built as a module and thus can be unloaded.
And because the shared callbacks are referenced from IRQ/NMI context,
unloading KVM can run concurrently with perf, and thus all of perf's
checks for a NULL perf_guest_cbs are flawed as perf_guest_cbs could be
nullified between the check and dereference.
In practice, this has not been problematic because the callbacks are
always guarded with a "perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()"
pattern, and it's extremely unlikely the compiler will choost to reload
perf_guest_cbs in that particular sequence. Because is_in_guest() is
obviously true only when KVM is running a guest, perf always wins the
race to the guarded code (which does often reload perf_guest_cbs) as KVM
has to stop running all guests and do a heavy teardown before unloading.
Cc: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
arch/x86/events/core.c | 17 +++++++++++------
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 8 +++++---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +-
kernel/events/core.c | 12 +++++++++---
5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
index 4a72c2727309..38555275c6a2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
@@ -102,7 +102,9 @@ compat_user_backtrace(struct compat_frame_tail __user *tail,
void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
+ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *guest_cbs = this_cpu_read(perf_guest_cbs);
+
+ if (guest_cbs && guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
/* We don't support guest os callchain now */
return;
}
@@ -147,9 +149,10 @@ static bool callchain_trace(void *data, unsigned long pc)
void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *guest_cbs = this_cpu_read(perf_guest_cbs);
struct stackframe frame;
- if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
+ if (guest_cbs && guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
/* We don't support guest os callchain now */
return;
}
@@ -160,18 +163,21 @@ void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest())
- return perf_guest_cbs->get_guest_ip();
+ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *guest_cbs = this_cpu_read(perf_guest_cbs);
+
+ if (guest_cbs && guest_cbs->is_in_guest())
+ return guest_cbs->get_guest_ip();
return instruction_pointer(regs);
}
unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *guest_cbs = this_cpu_read(perf_guest_cbs);
int misc = 0;
- if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
- if (perf_guest_cbs->is_user_mode())
+ if (guest_cbs && guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
+ if (guest_cbs->is_user_mode())
misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER;
else
misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 1eb45139fcc6..34155a52e498 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2761,10 +2761,11 @@ static bool perf_hw_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
void
perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *guest_cbs = this_cpu_read(perf_guest_cbs);
struct unwind_state state;
unsigned long addr;
- if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
+ if (guest_cbs && guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
/* TODO: We don't support guest os callchain now */
return;
}
@@ -2864,10 +2865,11 @@ perf_callchain_user32(struct pt_regs *regs, struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *ent
void
perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *guest_cbs = this_cpu_read(perf_guest_cbs);
struct stack_frame frame;
const struct stack_frame __user *fp;
- if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
+ if (guest_cbs && guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
/* TODO: We don't support guest os callchain now */
return;
}
@@ -2944,18 +2946,21 @@ static unsigned long code_segment_base(struct pt_regs *regs)
unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest())
- return perf_guest_cbs->get_guest_ip();
+ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *guest_cbs = this_cpu_read(perf_guest_cbs);
+
+ if (guest_cbs && guest_cbs->is_in_guest())
+ return guest_cbs->get_guest_ip();
return regs->ip + code_segment_base(regs);
}
unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *guest_cbs = this_cpu_read(perf_guest_cbs);
int misc = 0;
- if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
- if (perf_guest_cbs->is_user_mode())
+ if (guest_cbs && guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
+ if (guest_cbs->is_user_mode())
misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER;
else
misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index fca7a6e2242f..96001962c24d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -2784,6 +2784,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_reset(void)
static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
{
+ struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *guest_cbs;
struct perf_sample_data data;
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
int bit;
@@ -2852,9 +2853,10 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
*/
if (__test_and_clear_bit(GLOBAL_STATUS_TRACE_TOPAPMI_BIT, (unsigned long *)&status)) {
handled++;
- if (unlikely(perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest() &&
- perf_guest_cbs->handle_intel_pt_intr))
- perf_guest_cbs->handle_intel_pt_intr();
+ guest_cbs = this_cpu_read(perf_guest_cbs);
+ if (unlikely(guest_cbs && guest_cbs->is_in_guest() &&
+ guest_cbs->handle_intel_pt_intr))
+ guest_cbs->handle_intel_pt_intr();
else
intel_pt_interrupt();
}
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 5eab690622ca..c98253dae037 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ extern void perf_event_bpf_event(struct bpf_prog *prog,
u16 flags);
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_GUEST_PERF_EVENTS
-extern struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *perf_guest_cbs;
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *, perf_guest_cbs);
extern void perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *callbacks);
extern void perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(void);
#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_GUEST_PERF_EVENTS */
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 9820df7ee455..9bc1375d6ed9 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6483,17 +6483,23 @@ static void perf_pending_event(struct irq_work *entry)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_GUEST_PERF_EVENTS
-struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *perf_guest_cbs;
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *, perf_guest_cbs);
void perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *cbs)
{
- perf_guest_cbs = cbs;
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ per_cpu(perf_guest_cbs, cpu) = cbs;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_register_guest_info_callbacks);
void perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(void)
{
- perf_guest_cbs = NULL;
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ per_cpu(perf_guest_cbs, cpu) = NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks);
#endif
--
2.33.0.259.gc128427fd7-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-27 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-27 0:57 [PATCH 00/15] perf: KVM: Fix, optimize, and clean up callbacks Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 01/15] KVM: x86: Register perf callbacks after calling vendor's hardware_setup() Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 02/15] KVM: x86: Register Processor Trace interrupt hook iff PT enabled in guest Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 03/15] perf: Stop pretending that perf can handle multiple guest callbacks Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 04/15] perf: Force architectures to opt-in to " Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-08-27 7:15 ` [PATCH 05/15] perf: Track guest callbacks on a per-CPU basis Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-27 14:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-27 15:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 06/15] KVM: x86: Register perf callbacks only when actively handling interrupt Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 7:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 07/15] KVM: Use dedicated flag to track if KVM is handling an NMI from guest Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 7:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-27 14:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 08/15] KVM: x86: Drop current_vcpu in favor of kvm_running_vcpu Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 09/15] KVM: arm64: Register/unregister perf callbacks at vcpu load/put Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 10/15] KVM: Move x86's perf guest info callbacks to generic KVM Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 11/15] KVM: x86: Move Intel Processor Trace interrupt handler to vmx.c Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 7:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 12/15] KVM: arm64: Convert to the generic perf callbacks Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 13/15] KVM: arm64: Drop perf.c and fold its tiny bit of code into pmu.c Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 14/15] perf: Disallow bulk unregistering of guest callbacks and do cleanup Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 0:57 ` [PATCH 15/15] perf: KVM: Indicate "in guest" via NULL ->is_in_guest callback Sean Christopherson
2021-08-27 6:52 ` [PATCH 00/15] perf: KVM: Fix, optimize, and clean up callbacks Like Xu
2021-08-27 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-27 8:01 ` Like Xu
2021-08-27 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210827005718.585190-6-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=artem.kashkanov@intel.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=deanbo422@gmail.com \
--cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nickhu@andestech.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).