From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_RANDOM_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD042C432BE for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 06:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C195C60FC4 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 06:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241096AbhH0Grj (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2021 02:47:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55588 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231482AbhH0Grh (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2021 02:47:37 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22C5BC061757 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id u14so11574896ejf.13 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:46:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=udzHFNPd++YD0eVLDswSdAc73k4r2+aTjGa5bpUcLHY=; b=OKk3RmDtR1XuUdmnk9L+oWVj0snzZyozr8kxLQUb2TM8pLa32ggU/Rl9dUAHarIlau OjdTpBgAru88ElxFS9hRdjGuKbqLG0NFJ5FXouaMYS+suhEwElTRAFRWsgpYJCTRgbWu 7+HaxtjVYlLS3bODm7oPAs/+kvgd04A994M7UZjlrHjCBWGn6MmBb6UdRDng71WWNGCr LT1mKenqbWstNC0upgqiTByuX9HQyRAZF/U/ZFTVhNOB9YH1ByWL4mXG2w/bFoxmROvO FFjalVQilk2U1F5upHSC1Q5T45CUsS4GE/ROw9FVMI/j765AupUQ2au5bx8jwi3XdEE/ AKLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=udzHFNPd++YD0eVLDswSdAc73k4r2+aTjGa5bpUcLHY=; b=bJWAqkqL3Pct1GbHdoP4X5necmCwma6edwBoAcTdMJHleYzfGKy0beolLQbLVGA5WK 4pyzMENspPQ0Ve94XTvtr71TXyW8AZjaw15Kef9HXAI2A8y6TNKg6WGkNcIVq4QoblXQ yUJJDF5AO1HM9fRyuajRItmpb2Q1briEEAjM+DIUE7UmMGXNYGN0lZD/8Rj7o4ZSN8Fy vPJ1CMhifrZq97eT47bLTv19SQeIIbi+RsSI662nyOhYR22dIIMlA7MTRDYk7IpQZcbF E3FtmrH1JkARRyL9c/EueD/QBulWxpH+MRZ411vuO82yV2FH1YlDvZZCZeKpdpUE7PkY Y3Yg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533T/KxFhV2j046Y1hTx32Sz1+2vst4Be+XEUMWy3uM1vwvrwBPI A92NjGj5P6bT1c9Fw67Wyts= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZTriywfP9b2pKZqjIM3uJmmIr8wC7uaiJFoG1V2pr7GF/m615HWUAUveP6D1x/sGGznbUJw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:584b:: with SMTP id h11mr8497974ejs.209.1630046807722; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from agape.jhs ([5.171.72.0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l19sm2802849edb.86.2021.08.26.23.46.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:46:44 +0200 From: Fabio Aiuto To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Wenlong Zhang , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, ross.schm.dev@gmail.com, marcocesati@gmail.com, insafonov@gmail.com, cyruscyliu@gmail.com, yajin@vm-kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: prevent ->ssid overflow in rtw_wx_set_scan() Message-ID: <20210827064644.GA1408@agape.jhs> References: <20210826154622.55361-1-yixiaonn@gmail.com> <20210826172618.GB1423@agape.jhs> <20210826181648.GC1931@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210826181648.GC1931@kadam> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 09:16:48PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 07:26:19PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote: > > today the patch which removes wext handlers has been accepted > > (commit 174ac41a7aafb31041cba3fe54ccd89b9daeef5d) > > in staging-testing so maybe rtw_wx_set_scan is going to disappear. > > > > From a process perspective, in staging we don't track things that might > happen in the future. We look at each patch in the order that they > arrive and either apply them or reject them. Wenlong's patch will be applied on top of staging-testing first, and it won't apply due to wext-removal patch. > > And from a practical perspective this patch might be something that > people want to backport so it would be nice to apply it. > > regards, > dan carpenter thank you, fabio