linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86/kvm: add boot parameter for adding vcpu-id bits
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:48:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210903194824.lfjzeaab6ct72pxn@habkost.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210903130808.30142-3-jgross@suse.com>

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 03:08:03PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Today the maximum vcpu-id of a kvm guest's vcpu on x86 systems is set
> via a #define in a header file.
> 
> In order to support higher vcpu-ids without generally increasing the
> memory consumption of guests on the host (some guest structures contain
> arrays sized by KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID) add a boot parameter for adding some
> bits to the vcpu-id. Additional bits are needed as the vcpu-id is
> constructed via bit-wise concatenation of socket-id, core-id, etc.
> As those ids maximum values are not always a power of 2, the vcpu-ids
> are sparse.
> 
> The additional number of bits needed is basically the number of
> topology levels with a non-power-of-2 maximum value, excluding the top
> most level.
> 
> The default value of the new parameter will be to take the correct
> setting from the host's topology.

Having the default depend on the host topology makes the host
behaviour unpredictable (which might be a problem when migrating
VMs from another host with a different topology).  Can't we just
default to 2?

> 
> Calculating the maximum vcpu-id dynamically requires to allocate the
> arrays using KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID as the size dynamically.
> 
> Signed-of-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> ---
> V2:
> - switch to specifying additional bits (based on comment by Vitaly
>   Kuznetsov)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> ---
[...]
>  #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 288
>  #define KVM_SOFT_MAX_VCPUS 240
> -#define KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID 1023
> +#define KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID kvm_max_vcpu_id()
[...]
> +unsigned int kvm_max_vcpu_id(void)
> +{
> +	int n_bits = fls(KVM_MAX_VCPUS - 1);
> +
> +	if (vcpu_id_add_bits < -1 || vcpu_id_add_bits > (32 - n_bits)) {
> +		pr_err("Invalid value of vcpu_id_add_bits=%d parameter!\n",
> +		       vcpu_id_add_bits);
> +		vcpu_id_add_bits = -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (vcpu_id_add_bits >= 0) {
> +		n_bits += vcpu_id_add_bits;
> +	} else {
> +		n_bits++;		/* One additional bit for core level. */
> +		if (topology_max_die_per_package() > 1)
> +			n_bits++;	/* One additional bit for die level. */
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!n_bits)
> +		n_bits = 1;
> +
> +	return (1U << n_bits) - 1;

The largest possible VCPU ID is not KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID,
it's (KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID - 1).  This is enforced by
kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu().

That would mean KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID should be (1 << n_bits) instead
of ((1 << n_bits) - 1), wouldn't it?


> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_max_vcpu_id);
> +
>  /*
>   * Restoring the host value for MSRs that are only consumed when running in
>   * usermode, e.g. SYSCALL MSRs and TSC_AUX, can be deferred until the CPU
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

-- 
Eduardo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-03 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-03 13:08 [PATCH v2 0/6] x86/kvm: add boot parameters for max vcpu configs Juergen Gross
2021-09-03 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/kvm: remove non-x86 stuff from arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h Juergen Gross
2021-09-03 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] x86/kvm: add boot parameter for adding vcpu-id bits Juergen Gross
2021-09-03 13:43   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-03 13:53     ` Juergen Gross
2021-09-03 19:48   ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2021-09-06  4:46     ` Juergen Gross
2021-09-28 16:41   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-03 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] x86/kvm: introduce per cpu vcpu masks Juergen Gross
2021-09-03 16:05   ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-09-06  4:34     ` Juergen Gross
2021-09-07 18:34   ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-09-08  8:41     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-03 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] kvm: use kvfree() in kvm_arch_free_vm() Juergen Gross
2021-09-28 16:48   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-03 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] kvm: allocate vcpu pointer array separately Juergen Gross
2021-09-03 14:41   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-06  4:33     ` Juergen Gross
2021-09-06  9:46       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-09 20:28         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-03 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] x86/kvm: add boot parameter for setting max number of vcpus per guest Juergen Gross
2021-09-06  0:45   ` Yao Yuan
2021-09-06  4:47     ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210903194824.lfjzeaab6ct72pxn@habkost.net \
    --to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).