From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3E9C433FE for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 03:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8476109F for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 03:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235605AbhIGDlu (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2021 23:41:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37790 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233786AbhIGDlr (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 379FAC061757 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 20:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id n18so8533102pgm.12 for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 20:40:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FLF8sSQwhUS0+086sW1fmjexR33ZrApxSNSkWts8YRM=; b=nzh+u2Y81255wZnH+V4MUL8B8sO+5Od0TvnyoGtBXBxvY3GWkCS05hqcZ1FiPp66Y+ H/aLuFSamvMQxn4nX3sCYvr1vDDohLl/5eNT3FtPx/KARSpyx2ftPvZz45NpEUAFAaN3 nuqAcYDkZ/HcRrm6WqcyMuKl29Fr4l0lLirCtuq68ivwpbzUOj+5jaU/S74iEUJoxRqV Z/OLrLKs0O9bgfqMMgAsFQe8eBvb5Apzznl+Q3EF6QquxxEgfL1NhqCeEOD/tzrOfVQc j9FiRz3DOiSqILowuXrF1KILiP0Y/bHQvTid/J3SQIpAupZty6vyz4/uTkMkih+VObuO /YRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FLF8sSQwhUS0+086sW1fmjexR33ZrApxSNSkWts8YRM=; b=auTtPWTsHnYM40Xul58CeAvdq1hXgwlo0f7/XR260ZWwcYvJ9kR6mmMTBT//As8gdZ u4Bpuka9BLiPv+mIqvgtzwSGQMJNn8EL0TEKhQkVzis42ijPqSXHhcGOoLxhCjY29HFb J6bKAH3tRkQ42UmcMt7lylE7sTiLrK644ujeRBunhwYcONNUv7tPRySEHjh0Soxe7jPi RvRyWqLBjHAiXtbrvyAHESLTxTKP3UXyzw9bhBsq8XAbrxugai4tlHKicFjQxv95iRUf ITzvy2Hw6wgjTGipbRWtf+tG+QLnkKR0mE46Qva/b4LJZ0L8yanOzSNGxNb5/lfn8jr6 ZLwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bRKWArnjFs098nvmm5xY0IkcMb1/33VNVjxHpTj1/9NvYM/vy nhGir4DfC6beXQXCNIeBK0axJw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzsv/eia/hjQn1pbmQ2OENxmUodBBxcmYX5Fn6l3uMclKCItBuOiSE4NrFHNe0VdaUoPx8Y0A== X-Received: by 2002:a63:3c4d:: with SMTP id i13mr15152019pgn.54.1630986041664; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 20:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([122.172.201.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b16sm8897166pfr.138.2021.09.06.20.40.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Sep 2021 20:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 09:10:38 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Dmitry Osipenko Cc: Ulf Hansson , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Linux PM , Dmitry Baryshkov , Jonathan Hunter , Thierry Reding , Rajendra Nayak , Stephan Gerhold , Bjorn Andersson , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state() callback to genpd Message-ID: <20210907034038.ncx5nas6mhrk4u3r@vireshk-i7> References: <20210902101634.827187-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20210902101634.827187-4-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <4e36e732-6ca3-1d00-e6dd-38bb8877577b@gmail.com> <1124dae5-478f-f0ca-ea91-b6945f7c9254@gmail.com> <3d92711f-ce30-2c19-c6a4-bb77d32df2dd@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06-09-21, 17:35, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > Viresh, are you okay with going back to the variant with the > dev_pm_opp_sync() helper? I have missed a lot of stuff in between and wasn't following this carefully as I thought my half was resolved :) Can you describe what to propose to do again ? From what I remember, doing this one time from probe() is okay, doing it from suspend/resume, not so much. -- viresh