From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B818EC433F5 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 14:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A087B610FF for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 14:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244410AbhIIOih (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:38:37 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:42710 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243634AbhIIOiW (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:38:22 -0400 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C1181FE0D; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 14:37:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1631198231; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=B13u36Po4th2PuCEKGfMkrGfL3GxX63/1jwqx05ECVY=; b=rzmaYDhYG5qnwQA/AoM96BOvbbRiPT5ow5w4NWsIMzyC/qCkdSV04NKUjqShHai0jwl5Lu P0p7dna95aJJtXGORVvI/Mm6X7gp6dVNTcpPs86fJmhxNXO356fn0MEROIaHBgkuWAFYIN RMKpLOWT6ngoKabiOmsB2f1GUB5Rd+4= Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7324D13C53; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 14:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id Y+/VGhccOmHVOwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 09 Sep 2021 14:37:11 +0000 Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:37:10 +0200 From: Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= To: brookxu Cc: tj@kernel.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, vipinsh@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] misc_cgroup: introduce misc.failcnt for V1 Message-ID: <20210909143709.GA14603@blackbody.suse.cz> References: <988f340462a1a3c62b7dc2c64ceb89a4c0a00552.1631077837.git.brookxu@tencent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 01:24:35PM +0800, brookxu wrote: > introduce misc.failcnt for cgroup v1 to make it easier for us to > understand the pressure of resources. As argued in the patch 1/3, I'd drop this change completely. Thanks, Michal