From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH resend RFC 2/9] s390/gmap: don't unconditionally call pte_unmap_unlock() in __gmap_zap()
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:22:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210909162248.14969-3-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210909162248.14969-1-david@redhat.com>
... otherwise we will try unlocking a spinlock that was never locked via a
garbage pointer.
At the time we reach this code path, we usually successfully looked up
a PGSTE already; however, evil user space could have manipulated the VMA
layout in the meantime and triggered removal of the page table.
Fixes: 1e133ab296f3 ("s390/mm: split arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
index b6b56cd4ca64..9023bf3ced89 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
@@ -690,9 +690,10 @@ void __gmap_zap(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr)
/* Get pointer to the page table entry */
ptep = get_locked_pte(gmap->mm, vmaddr, &ptl);
- if (likely(ptep))
+ if (likely(ptep)) {
ptep_zap_unused(gmap->mm, vmaddr, ptep, 0);
- pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
+ pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
+ }
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__gmap_zap);
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-09 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-09 16:22 [PATCH resend RFC 0/9] s390: fixes, cleanups and optimizations for page table walkers David Hildenbrand
2021-09-09 16:22 ` [PATCH resend RFC 1/9] s390/gmap: validate VMA in __gmap_zap() David Hildenbrand
2021-09-14 16:53 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-09 16:22 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-09-14 16:52 ` [PATCH resend RFC 2/9] s390/gmap: don't unconditionally call pte_unmap_unlock() " Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-09 16:22 ` [PATCH resend RFC 3/9] s390/mm: validate VMA in PGSTE manipulation functions David Hildenbrand
2021-09-14 16:54 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-09 16:22 ` [PATCH resend RFC 4/9] s390/mm: fix VMA and page table handling code in storage key handling functions David Hildenbrand
2021-09-27 16:37 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-09 16:22 ` [PATCH resend RFC 5/9] s390/uv: fully validate the VMA before calling follow_page() David Hildenbrand
2021-09-14 16:53 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-14 22:41 ` Liam Howlett
2021-09-09 16:22 ` [PATCH resend RFC 6/9] s390/pci_mmio: fully validate the VMA before calling follow_pte() David Hildenbrand
2021-09-14 16:54 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-14 22:41 ` Liam Howlett
2021-09-09 16:22 ` [PATCH resend RFC 7/9] s390/mm: no need for pte_alloc_map_lock() if we know the pmd is present David Hildenbrand
2021-09-14 16:54 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-14 17:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-09 16:22 ` [PATCH resend RFC 8/9] s390/mm: optimize set_guest_storage_key() David Hildenbrand
2021-09-27 17:01 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-09 16:22 ` [PATCH resend RFC 9/9] s390/mm: optimize reset_guest_reference_bit() David Hildenbrand
2021-09-27 17:02 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-14 16:50 ` [PATCH resend RFC 0/9] s390: fixes, cleanups and optimizations for page table walkers Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-14 18:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-28 10:59 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-09-28 11:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-28 14:38 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-28 16:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210909162248.14969-3-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).