From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@gmail.com>,
Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/18] staging: r8188eu: Shorten calls chain of rtw_read8/16/32()
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 16:01:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210914130112.GD2116@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5747368.884CoaO9ss@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 02:55:45PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 11:32:58 AM CEST Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 08:10:01PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > > + if (status == (-ESHUTDOWN || -ENODEV || -ENOENT)) {
> >
> > if (status == -ESHUTDOWN ||
> > status == -ENODEV ||
> > status == -ENOENT) {
>
> This is a stupid mistake and Pavel soon noticed it. Yesterday I sent a
> message to ask reviewers for disregarding v4 and wait for v5 with the fix of
> this test. :(
There wasn't enough information in the email to know what issue you had
seen. I had already started reviewing it when I saw the email.
>
> However, I noticed that usb_control_msg_recv() might return in "status" some
> recoverable errors (like -ENOMEM and others); so I guess that the code must
> retry in a while loop (exactly as it did with usb_control_msg() in
> usbctrl_vendorreq()).
I would not add a while loop unless testing shows it is required.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-14 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-13 18:09 [PATCH v4 00/18] staging: r8188eu: Shorten and simplify calls chain Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] staging: r8188eu: remove usb_{read,write}_mem Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] staging: r8188eu: remove the helpers of rtw_read8() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] staging: r8188eu: remove the helpers of rtw_read16() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] staging: r8188eu: remove the helpers of rtw_read32() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] staging: r8188eu: remove the helpers of usb_write8 Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] staging: r8188eu: remove the helpers of usb_write16() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] staging: r8188eu: remove the helpers of usb_write32() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] staging: r8188eu: remove the helpers of usb_writeN() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] staging: r8188eu: remove the helpers of rtw_read_port() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] staging: r8188eu: remove the helpers of rtw_write_port() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] staging: r8188eu: remove the helpers of usb_read_port_cancel() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] staging: r8188eu: remove the helpers of rtw_write_port_cancel() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] staging: r8188eu: remove core/rtw_io.c Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] staging: remove struct _io_ops Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:09 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] staging: r8188eu: hal: Clean up usbctrl_vendorreq() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-14 9:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-09-14 11:18 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-14 12:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-09-14 13:24 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-14 13:30 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-09-14 14:05 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 18:10 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] staging: r8188eu: hal: Clean up rtw_read*() and rtw_write*() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-14 14:33 ` David Laight
2021-09-13 18:10 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] staging: r8188eu: Shorten calls chain of rtw_read8/16/32() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 20:19 ` Pavel Skripkin
2021-09-14 9:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-09-14 12:55 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-14 13:01 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2021-09-13 18:10 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] staging: r8188eu: Shorten calls chain of rtw_write8/16/32/N() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-13 20:35 ` [PATCH v4 00/18] staging: r8188eu: Shorten and simplify calls chain Fabio M. De Francesco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210914130112.GD2116@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paskripkin@gmail.com \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).