From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0A0C433EF for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 06:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1D461157 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 06:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236438AbhIOGl6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 02:41:58 -0400 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]:16206 "EHLO szxga08-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229484AbhIOGl5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 02:41:57 -0400 Received: from dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4H8Vtw36hbz1DH1t; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:39:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500018.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.186) by dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:40:32 +0800 Received: from huawei.com (10.67.175.23) by dggpeml500018.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:40:32 +0800 From: Zhang Qiao To: , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH v3] kernel/sched: Fix sched_fork() access an invalid sched_task_group Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:40:30 +0800 Message-ID: <20210915064030.2231-1-zhangqiao22@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.67.175.23] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpeml500018.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.186) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org There is a small race between copy_process() and sched_fork() where child->sched_task_group point to an already freed pointer. parent doing fork() | someone moving the parent to another cgroup -------------------------------+------------------------------- copy_process() + dup_task_struct()<1> parent move to another cgroup, and free the old cgroup. <2> + sched_fork() + __set_task_cpu()<3> + task_fork_fair() + sched_slice()<4> In the worst case, this bug can lead to "use-after-free" and cause panic as shown above, (1)parent copy its sched_task_group to child at <1>; (2)someone move the parent to another cgroup and free the old cgroup at <2>; (3)the sched_task_group and cfs_rq that belong to the old cgroup will be accessed at <3> and <4>, which cause a panic: [89249.732198] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000000 [89249.732701] PGD 8000001fa0a86067 P4D 8000001fa0a86067 PUD 2029955067 PMD 0 [89249.733005] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [89249.733288] CPU: 7 PID: 648398 Comm: ebizzy Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE --------- - - 4.18.0.x86_64+ #1 [89249.734318] RIP: 0010:sched_slice+0x84/0xc0 .... [89249.737910] Call Trace: [89249.738181] task_fork_fair+0x81/0x120 [89249.738457] sched_fork+0x132/0x240 [89249.738732] copy_process.part.5+0x675/0x20e0 [89249.739010] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x63f/0x690 [89249.739286] _do_fork+0xcd/0x3b0 [89249.739558] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x1d0 [89249.739830] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca [89249.740107] RIP: 0033:0x7f04418cd7e1 Between cgroup_can_fork() and cgroup_post_fork(), the cgroup membership and thus sched_task_group can't change. So update child's sched_task_group at sched_post_fork() and move task_fork() and __set_task_cpu() (where accees the sched_task_group) from sched_fork() to sched_post_fork(). Fixes: 8323f26ce342 ("sched: Fix race in task_group") Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao --- include/linux/sched/task.h | 3 ++- kernel/fork.c | 2 +- kernel/sched/core.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sched/task.h b/include/linux/sched/task.h index ef02be869cf2..ba88a6987400 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched/task.h +++ b/include/linux/sched/task.h @@ -54,7 +54,8 @@ extern asmlinkage void schedule_tail(struct task_struct *prev); extern void init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu); extern int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p); -extern void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p); +extern void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p, + struct kernel_clone_args *kargs); extern void sched_dead(struct task_struct *p); void __noreturn do_task_dead(void); diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c index 38681ad44c76..0e4251dc5436 100644 --- a/kernel/fork.c +++ b/kernel/fork.c @@ -2405,7 +2405,7 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process( write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); proc_fork_connector(p); - sched_post_fork(p); + sched_post_fork(p, args); cgroup_post_fork(p, args); perf_event_fork(p); diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index c4462c454ab9..57544053be5a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -4328,8 +4328,6 @@ int sysctl_schedstats(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer, */ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p) { - unsigned long flags; - __sched_fork(clone_flags, p); /* * We mark the process as NEW here. This guarantees that @@ -4375,24 +4373,6 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p) init_entity_runnable_average(&p->se); - /* - * The child is not yet in the pid-hash so no cgroup attach races, - * and the cgroup is pinned to this child due to cgroup_fork() - * is ran before sched_fork(). - * - * Silence PROVE_RCU. - */ - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); - rseq_migrate(p); - /* - * We're setting the CPU for the first time, we don't migrate, - * so use __set_task_cpu(). - */ - __set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id()); - if (p->sched_class->task_fork) - p->sched_class->task_fork(p); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); - #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_INFO if (likely(sched_info_on())) memset(&p->sched_info, 0, sizeof(p->sched_info)); @@ -4408,8 +4388,29 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p) return 0; } -void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p) +void sched_post_fork(struct task_struct *p, struct kernel_clone_args *kargs) { + unsigned long flags; +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED + struct task_group *tg; +#endif + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED + tg = container_of(kargs->cset->subsys[cpu_cgrp_id], + struct task_group, css); + p->sched_task_group = autogroup_task_group(p, tg); +#endif + rseq_migrate(p); + /* + * We're setting the CPU for the first time, we don't migrate, + * so use __set_task_cpu(). + */ + __set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id()); + if (p->sched_class->task_fork) + p->sched_class->task_fork(p); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); + uclamp_post_fork(p); } -- 2.25.1