Hi Uwe, [Sorry this took so long] On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:10:14 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > I intended to take a look at the resolution that Vinod pushed in his > tree. To find his tree and the right branch my approach in such a > situation is usually: > > uwe@taurus:~/gsrc/linux$ git name-rev d9e5481fca74 > d9e5481fca74 tags/next-20210722~22^2~2 > > so it was merged in tags/next-20210722~22, looking at that I see: > > uwe@taurus:~/gsrc/linux$ git show tags/next-20210722~22 > commit 65da974af6a0d913cde0cf59f517322bceac24a7 > ... > Merge remote-tracking branch 'dmaengine/next' > > and then I have to lookup what dmaengine/next means in next-20210722: > > uwe@taurus:~/gsrc/linux$ git show next-20210722 | grep dmaen > ... > +dmaengine git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/dmaengine.git#next > ... > > You could save me the last step if you used > > git pull dmaengine next > > instead of > > git merge dmaengine/next > > because then the commit message of tags/next-20210722~22 would be: > > Merge branch 'next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/dmaengine.git > > which is much more useful than > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'dmaengine/next' > > . Otherwise the result should be the same (apart from fetching the > changes a tad later maybe). Thanks for the feed back. I prefer to fetch all the trees (and run my checking scripts across them independently of the merge/build cycle. However, I have improved the merge commit messages (I think). Please check out today's linux-next. I have decided to remove the SHA1 from the message, as you can see that from what is merged anyway. Let me know if this is better for you. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell