From: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: advansys: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 13:18:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210918111805.15471-1-len.baker@gmx.com> (raw)
As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.
So, refactor the code a bit to use the struct_size() helper instead of
the argument "size + count * size" in the kzalloc() function.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments
Signed-off-by: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>
---
drivers/scsi/advansys.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/advansys.c b/drivers/scsi/advansys.c
index ffb391967573..fe882502e7bf 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/advansys.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/advansys.c
@@ -7465,6 +7465,7 @@ static int asc_build_req(struct asc_board *boardp, struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
return ASC_BUSY;
} else if (use_sg > 0) {
int sgcnt;
+ size_t size;
struct scatterlist *slp;
struct asc_sg_head *asc_sg_head;
@@ -7477,8 +7478,8 @@ static int asc_build_req(struct asc_board *boardp, struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
return ASC_ERROR;
}
- asc_sg_head = kzalloc(sizeof(asc_scsi_q->sg_head) +
- use_sg * sizeof(struct asc_sg_list), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ size = struct_size(asc_scsi_q->sg_head, sg_list, use_sg);
+ asc_sg_head = kzalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!asc_sg_head) {
scsi_dma_unmap(scp);
set_host_byte(scp, DID_SOFT_ERROR);
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-09-18 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-18 11:18 Len Baker [this message]
2021-09-20 23:57 ` [PATCH] scsi: advansys: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic Gustavo A. R. Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210918111805.15471-1-len.baker@gmx.com \
--to=len.baker@gmx.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).