linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	<mhocko@suse.com>, <rui.xiang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] mm: Fix the uninitialized use in overcommit_policy_handler
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:05:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210923020524.13289-1-chenjun102@huawei.com> (raw)

An unexpected value of /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory we will get,
after running the following program.

int main()
{
    int fd = open("/proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory", O_RDWR)
    write(fd, "1", 1);
    write(fd, "2", 1);
    close(fd);
}

write(fd, "2", 1) will pass *ppos = 1 to proc_dointvec_minmax.
proc_dointvec_minmax will return 0 without setting new_policy.

t.data = &new_policy;
ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(&t, write, buffer, lenp, ppos)
      -->do_proc_dointvec
         -->__do_proc_dointvec
              if (write) {
                if (proc_first_pos_non_zero_ignore(ppos, table))
                  goto out;

sysctl_overcommit_memory = new_policy;

so sysctl_overcommit_memory will be set to an uninitialized value.

Check whether new_policy has been changed by proc_dointvec_minmax.

Fixes: 56f3547bfa4d ("mm: adjust vm_committed_as_batch according to vm overcommit policy"
Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>

---

v3:
  * Correct commit message.

v2:
  * Check whether new_policy has been changed by proc_dointvec_minmax.

 mm/util.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
index 4ddb6e186dd5..d5be67771850 100644
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ int overcommit_policy_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
 		size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	struct ctl_table t;
-	int new_policy;
+	int new_policy = -1;
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ int overcommit_policy_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
 		t = *table;
 		t.data = &new_policy;
 		ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(&t, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
-		if (ret)
+		if (ret || new_policy == -1)
 			return ret;
 
 		mm_compute_batch(new_policy);
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-23  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-23  2:05 Chen Jun [this message]
2021-09-24  2:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] mm: Fix the uninitialized use in overcommit_policy_handler Andrew Morton
2021-09-24  2:41   ` Kefeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210923020524.13289-1-chenjun102@huawei.com \
    --to=chenjun102@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rui.xiang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).