From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F9DC433FE for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 21:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7765560EDF for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 21:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230100AbhIYVwW (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Sep 2021 17:52:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57792 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229997AbhIYVwR (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Sep 2021 17:52:17 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FA9AC061570; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 14:50:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id v10so19762202oic.12; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 14:50:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Lra2EsvoeNTlw4NaYwSSQUP8cZMT8qJ1eGcHRJ3D2wE=; b=g0Qs4UienYUHrVXCnAB2YwUTeDYgyXn5TSKEDxTBkR68SoDQP4mHVdZ2DOzE17zLwC hxiScVxCix6toZVjbE6vi2966ndXqnKXNRn42+KJcGEFk8y16TCANQ8Sv2yFOEVRrIB9 7sQ/9Bb4LTaZ3IXf37hC7y92rs3BQAIscvlP3POVxrptF0RMybAXTCEmzwMW2aLOmusl v+Yn22whm6DsKjzHCrDRaLfXDLNfKiZobPVC1E1VJQYM7aykwljBFFXS9TR2mY59HBo9 OMWj+u5uKd20yEAApRRKFlqeZ6RQLORC7ID47SeLaZvK1Gw7x3Z35lnoCcW1Rd17eC8L S8Aw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Lra2EsvoeNTlw4NaYwSSQUP8cZMT8qJ1eGcHRJ3D2wE=; b=5K6m3bxPH9+KFUijSJFe/0uZiKiKgJNL7pgTqi7xLwvAXylEpSaeySUQlNwYwA2HZ8 h2RL0xBqfCJujvWPjZKWlkUX4jAktJIafa+huzQYI/OM/gRip7zrOYpFEs/BU41iCAyU J2Ulhu1zgQJDPtdUt27+Xm2gLZrMM8qLZI14bZTL23ymLyaPG0zHETdOlRbymqPEeCdx BCJULcO/fKmBe6uaq5Jf3s9C69lIjifYjdNw5AL4iENeZzz/jxXJEsKVXVlh31T2Fvqr mWmq37bSD6Ij029icBJIcR9fJKhqMaipiuaNQYdi5dKOCH8Wo9RGho2tihXfS95XcZGP KEKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532nzOObNoYBV/S3XE4BefEjFx3sbtP4fDWR/s+0cXxxEBzfsMZc eTpipKyJy8HdkQvzI1ko96w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxn3Dy4VPH+JkfPlur7/epQbXp0YqZZHMJYGd/6ZQVFCexRGc/A2zBJGHyj9jZepNQ/TOqYzw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:144b:: with SMTP id x11mr6561778oiv.111.1632606641599; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 14:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q31sm2943042otv.57.2021.09.25.14.50.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 25 Sep 2021 14:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 14:50:39 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/64] 5.10.69-rc2 review Message-ID: <20210925215039.GF563939@roeck-us.net> References: <20210925120750.056868347@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210925120750.056868347@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 02:14:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.69 release. > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:07:36 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 472 pass: 472 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Guenter