From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] irq_work: PREEMPT_RT bits
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 23:19:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210927211919.310855-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (raw)
This are the PREEMPT_RT bits for irq_work. The annotation for
IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ was already merged except for one missed annotation.
Patch #4 introduces the required processing split of callbacks with are
really invoked from hard-irq context and those which are delayed until
the softirq timer tick. This has been done as quite a few them acquire
locks which need to sleep on PREEMPT_RT and must not be invoked in
hardirq context. We can not delay all of them since a few need to be
invoked hardirq context in order to work properly (NOHZ, scheduler, …).
Sebastian
next reply other threads:[~2021-09-27 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-27 21:19 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2021-09-27 21:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/rt: Annotate the RT balancing logic irqwork as IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-09-27 21:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] irq_work: Ensure that irq_work runs in in-IRQ context Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-10-05 15:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-10-05 20:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-27 21:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] irq_work: Allow irq_work_sync() to sleep if irq_work() no IRQ support Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-09-27 21:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] irq_work: Handle some irq_work in SOFTIRQ on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-09-30 9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-30 9:53 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-09-30 14:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-30 16:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-10-01 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-01 12:08 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-10-01 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-27 21:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] irq_work: Also rcuwait for !IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210927211919.310855-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).