From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689D5C433F5 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2021 21:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431AC61B2C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2021 21:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234054AbhJBVOm (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:14:42 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:40889 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233122AbhJBVOl (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:14:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1633209159; bh=yxMgNzarObbpsQDZSpvaMKY0E67LlRv3HMOpH2GLwpw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:CC:In-reply-to:Subject:Reply-to: References:Date; b=GZ8lvrhhxnbOdthB46NN5c0wvqBLCXsm+1acLFQc7yIY60DbDxPvBlgK06Mdkd3l/ Sk0/5gIgHqfMkSLJCq42UfGmT+duVTkIUuDqZJnZlyau9VSirGKe2zHoHKaykmsfO1 el+e9Qbq1mB0OPP1CTFQA/vgkLxAjSAhex1j36c0= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from corona.crabdance.com ([173.228.106.131]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MEFvj-1mgzSM0qM1-00AIH5; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 23:12:39 +0200 Received: by corona.crabdance.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C8546899763; Sat, 2 Oct 2021 14:12:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Stefan Schaeckeler To: richard@nod.at CC: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: <160773399.91203.1632175069460.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (message from Richard Weinberger on Mon, 20 Sep 2021 23:57:49 +0200 (CEST)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] ubifs: ubifs to export filesystem error counters Content-Type: text/plain Reply-to: schaecsn@gmx.net References: <20210907214034.11676-1-schaecsn@gmx.net> <20210920024824.9E053899858@corona.crabdance.com> <160773399.91203.1632175069460.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> Message-Id: <20211002211234.C8546899763@corona.crabdance.com> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 14:12:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:MCTHo0Wi5ZVuZV+KppndXsSykkDLji6uoywLoQOeoirDVs+SAGl 0eAEqG8eHUt4400kwgqyW0vEB7qeei+DTuVgkIC+Sz2PPGtmz09J83bi22EkrWWyOTqkPno lpm8EK5LhFdj/0wi/dNX9GnEht8giL52uKFbncVORHS0L7RL0qz1BlkD25jssq9csj0CbSS wM+SVhyGrtaMwDmKulYPA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:k1mpkITKCeU=:hG3I8YuqG0vFlb4+tRvmnL bxPzYWNB+tNeUct7FPRl1xkglGCYapvK6YQWY3vqsnQvUeYYyYaNYJrkNJePdWd15ZoAP0Vzo oBInBSVnt3/cEjQojQRKP2m3AMk+eyzyNAMklFIE7EwzFi3Q1ppOeV/JlTKiT8v4BOpryTJOU kAemnqpTw/MBeoSmbkLJcSvGx4430zor/do+rfSfUq4v/O0IeYxVKAJIjfDwgeAK8+6ImqbAi t7uuOyOzqZ4O2dtovvWxo4psULGySVEOKNg87nXPKZYbXKwWzvbucVdmdV89RYRSpges5O28c 9ouMxXFEmUTCxKjUR0YNX0n3JcoPtaLgIFO7PU8oa+JFtvksh+5rLzp5QYSv5Hq5v01tV5I4x XUIK941R2XHqlwA2zZG+5OyjV79pflbeRKGtRN7cPyLczC62LbugSEYI1VpFwFBgLKB67dkXB XQr2v5vlYt4athjeARtqPR9D/wr5MdqOAIpDnkB5mFppQkS8hmlBX30z+aEz+/HdR8cBn2KdM L9iO/H24zbBATQSHU+CX9DaJzpJPu9mCB0ihdq1D/oFNM71zk8gJ3ZZ4XNd+M9Scr25R6t/rs ud6xKWDYZS2wJUcWjck6BvtcUuKb+MuBooiY3IrVybkc4fqeJWh8BJuFDardBu4V9yftDe8PS CpxEP2p4d7sF7Cw5xPMjHPYORfMonDHWvOfla/ALoSye73horjLq7DGZ0UbTUmHhm59IlJbiD g0LhyHqPMTg9p//iLxDhIoZIU+qJWPYYPS0nhv2Ve4k0NJ1NwEK4QUqd/30hlNPuVF6KHKoPq 7qsp2hCFWlSX1ioe0HtQnHNXzkOr2B96fCkLvJlUA9MoOvESVvr9i5v9oUswR6U6Cj7W/vcP0 gmRevF61CMqsB5fMTEygJDs+cNFuwV0GgjyMsKkAMvBeWZ8t/nRd6Xu1EZzW1HFsksw5BVGGY SBduN3d7y9eMfOg6cI/Q9XNKCjQx6dZgYsVb+dNa+BSF34xhy3uPsraobiGZs19VDBQyaUDUt K+a7qGV35cYYS+O+iSZ4HBzMoHLGtW4Rmgd0n7xbdwqoHFJkhU0ukS9eZtoE//ej7SYytxgZ4 81dPIbteUnm4aw= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Richard, > > Hello mtd/ubifs, > > > > I just want to check back on what you think about having a sysfs for u= bifs and > > starting with these three callbacks > > > > /sys/fs/ubifs/ubiX_Y/errors_magic > > /sys/fs/ubifs/ubiX_Y/errors_node > > /sys/fs/ubifs/ubiX_Y/errors_crc > > I didn't have a chance to review your changes to far but in general I li= ke the idea > if exposing such an interface. > Sorry for being a slow maintainer. I just wonder if you still like the idea of a sysfs for ubifs. At one poin= t we should then move forward. Stefan