From: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Amey Narkhede <ameynarkhede03@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] PCI: pciehp: Use RESPONSE_IS_PCI_ERROR() to check read from hardware
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:35:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211012160505.3dov6gjnmxdq5lz6@theprophet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211011194740.GA14357@wunner.de>
On 11/10, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:37:33PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote:
> > An MMIO read from a PCI device that doesn't exist or doesn't respond
> > causes a PCI error. There's no real data to return to satisfy the
> > CPU read, so most hardware fabricates ~0 data.
> >
> > Use RESPONSE_IS_PCI_ERROR() to check the response we get when we read
> > data from hardware.
>
> Actually what happens is that PCI read transactions *time out*,
> so the host controller fabricates a response.
>
Ah! yes. Now that I look at it, RESPONSE_IS_PCI_TIMEOUT() does indeed
seem like a better option to RESPONSE_IS_PCI_ERROR(), since it's more
specfic and depicts the actual condition.
I'll wait for sometime and see if others have any objection/a better
name for the macro and then redo the patch with that.
Thank you very much for the review ^^
> By contrast, a PCI *error* usually denotes an Uncorrectable or
> Correctable Error as specified in section 6.2.2 of the PCIe Base Spec.
>
> Thus something like RESPONSE_IS_PCI_TIMEOUT() or IS_PCI_TIMEOUT() would
> probably be more appropriate. I'll leave the exact bikeshed color for
> others to decide. :-)
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-12 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-11 17:35 [PATCH 00/22] PCI: Unify PCI error response checking Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 17:37 ` [PATCH 01/22] PCI: Add PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE and it's related defintions Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 02/22] PCI: Unify PCI error response checking Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 22:05 ` Rob Herring
2021-10-12 16:21 ` Naveen Naidu
2021-10-12 18:02 ` Rob Herring
2021-10-12 22:52 ` Pali Rohár
2021-10-13 2:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-13 13:06 ` Rob Herring
2021-10-13 17:16 ` Naveen Naidu
2021-10-13 17:54 ` Pali Rohár
2021-10-13 18:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-13 21:47 ` Rob Herring
2021-10-13 22:03 ` Pali Rohár
2021-10-13 22:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-11 17:45 ` [PATCH 03/22] PCI: thunder: Use SET_PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE() when device not found Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 17:46 ` [PATCH 04/22] PCI: iproc: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 17:51 ` [PATCH 05/22] PCI: mediatek: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH 06/22] PCI: exynos: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 17:53 ` [PATCH 07/22] PCI: histb: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 17:55 ` [PATCH 08/22] PCI: kirin: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 17:56 ` [PATCH 09/22] PCI: aardvark: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 18:08 ` Pali Rohár
2021-10-11 18:28 ` Naveen Naidu
[not found] ` <20211011182526.kboaxqofdpd2jjrl@theprophet>
2021-10-11 18:41 ` Pali Rohár
2021-10-12 15:59 ` Naveen Naidu
2021-10-13 2:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-13 17:59 ` Pali Rohár
2021-10-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 10/22] PCI: mvebu: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 11/22] PCI: altera: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 18:02 ` [PATCH 12/22] PCI: rcar: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 18:02 ` [PATCH 13/22] PCI: rockchip: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 18:04 ` [PATCH 14/22] PCI/ERR: Use RESPONSE_IS_PCI_ERROR() to check read from hardware Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 18:06 ` [PATCH 15/22] PCI: vmd: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-14 18:04 ` Jonathan Derrick
2021-10-11 18:07 ` [PATCH 16/22] PCI: pciehp: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 19:47 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-10-12 16:05 ` Naveen Naidu [this message]
2021-10-12 23:12 ` Pali Rohár
2021-10-13 12:20 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-10-11 18:08 ` [PATCH 17/22] PCI/DPC: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 18:10 ` [PATCH 18/22] PCI/PME: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 18:11 ` [PATCH 19/22] PCI: cpqphp: " Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 18:11 ` [PATCH 20/22] PCI: keystone: Use PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE to specify hardware error Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 18:12 ` [PATCH 21/22] PCI: hv: Use PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE to specify hardware read error Naveen Naidu
2021-10-11 18:13 ` [PATCH 22/22] PCI: xgene: Use PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE to specify hardware error Naveen Naidu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211012160505.3dov6gjnmxdq5lz6@theprophet \
--to=naveennaidu479@gmail.com \
--cc=ameynarkhede03@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).