Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] reset: mchp: sparx5: Extend support for lan966x

[Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>]

The 10/14/2021 14:00, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 09:38 +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > This patch extends sparx5 driver to support also the lan966x. The
> > process to reset the switch is the same only it has different offsets.
> > Therefore make the driver more generic and add support for lan966x.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> > ---
> >  drivers/reset/Kconfig                  |  2 +-
> >  drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/reset/Kconfig b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> > index be799a5abf8a..36ce6c8bcf1e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ config RESET_LPC18XX
> >
> >  config RESET_MCHP_SPARX5
> >       bool "Microchip Sparx5 reset driver"
> > -     depends on ARCH_SPARX5 || COMPILE_TEST
> > +     depends on ARCH_SPARX5 || SOC_LAN966 || COMPILE_TEST
> >       default y if SPARX5_SWITCH
> >       select MFD_SYSCON
> >       help
> > diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c b/drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c
> > index f01e7db8e83b..211ee338e4b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c
> > +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> >   * The Sparx5 Chip Register Model can be browsed at this location:
> >   * https://github.com/microchip-ung/sparx-5_reginfo
> >   */
> > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> >  #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > @@ -13,15 +14,22 @@
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >  #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> >
> > -#define PROTECT_REG    0x84
> > -#define PROTECT_BIT    BIT(10)
> > -#define SOFT_RESET_REG 0x00
> > -#define SOFT_RESET_BIT BIT(1)
> > +struct reset_props {
> > +     u32 protect_reg;
> > +     u32 protect_bit;
> > +     u32 reset_reg;
> > +     u32 reset_bit;
> > +     u32 cuphy_reg;
> > +     u32 cuphy_bit;
> > +};
> >
> >  struct mchp_reset_context {
> >       struct regmap *cpu_ctrl;
> >       struct regmap *gcb_ctrl;
> > +     struct regmap *cuphy_ctrl;
> >       struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
> > +     const struct reset_props *props;
> > +     struct gpio_desc *phy_reset_gpio;
> >  };
> >
> >  static struct regmap_config sparx5_reset_regmap_config = {
> > @@ -36,17 +44,39 @@ static int sparx5_switch_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> >       struct mchp_reset_context *ctx =
> >               container_of(rcdev, struct mchp_reset_context, rcdev);
> >       u32 val;
> > +     int err;
> >
> >       /* Make sure the core is PROTECTED from reset */
> > -     regmap_update_bits(ctx->cpu_ctrl, PROTECT_REG, PROTECT_BIT, PROTECT_BIT);
> > +     regmap_update_bits(ctx->cpu_ctrl, ctx->props->protect_reg,
> > +                        ctx->props->protect_bit, ctx->props->protect_bit);
> >
> >       /* Start soft reset */
> > -     regmap_write(ctx->gcb_ctrl, SOFT_RESET_REG, SOFT_RESET_BIT);
> > +     regmap_write(ctx->gcb_ctrl, ctx->props->reset_reg,
> > +                  ctx->props->reset_bit);
> >
> >       /* Wait for soft reset done */
> > -     return regmap_read_poll_timeout(ctx->gcb_ctrl, SOFT_RESET_REG, val,
> > -                                     (val & SOFT_RESET_BIT) == 0,
> > +     err = regmap_read_poll_timeout(ctx->gcb_ctrl, ctx->props->reset_reg, val,
> > +                                     (val & ctx->props->reset_bit) == 0,
> >                                       1, 100);
> > +     if (err)
> > +             return err;
> > +
> > +     if (!ctx->cuphy_ctrl)
> > +             return 0;
> > +
> > +     /* In case there are external PHYs toggle the GPIO to release the reset
> > +      * of the PHYs
> > +      */
> > +     if (ctx->phy_reset_gpio) {
> > +             gpiod_direction_output(ctx->phy_reset_gpio, 1);
> > +             gpiod_set_value(ctx->phy_reset_gpio, 0);
> > +             gpiod_set_value(ctx->phy_reset_gpio, 1);
> > +             gpiod_set_value(ctx->phy_reset_gpio, 0);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     /* Release the reset of internal PHY */
> > +     return regmap_update_bits(ctx->cuphy_ctrl, ctx->props->cuphy_reg,
> > +                               ctx->props->cuphy_bit, ctx->props->cuphy_bit);
> >  }
> >
> >  static const struct reset_control_ops sparx5_reset_ops = {
> > @@ -111,17 +141,52 @@ static int mchp_sparx5_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       if (err)
> >               return err;
> >
> > +     /* This resource is required on lan966x, to take the internal PHYs out
> > +      * of reset
> 
> Ah, here we go, required on lan966x. This should be reflected in the
> binding yaml.

I will update the binding yaml.

> 
> > +      */
> > +     err = mchp_sparx5_map_syscon(pdev, "cuphy-syscon", &ctx->cuphy_ctrl);
> > +     if (err && err != -ENODEV)
> > +             return err;
> 
> So -ENODEV should return an error if .cuphy_reg is set?

I am not sure I follow this.
If cuphy-syscon is not set then mchp_sparx5_map_syscon will return
-ENODEV. This can be ignored for sparx5 as this is not required.
If cuphy-syscon is set then if mchp_sparx5_map_syscon returns an error
then report this error.

> 
> > +
> >       ctx->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> >       ctx->rcdev.nr_resets = 1;
> >       ctx->rcdev.ops = &sparx5_reset_ops;
> >       ctx->rcdev.of_node = dn;
> > +     ctx->props = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > +
> > +     ctx->phy_reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "phy-reset",
> > +                                                   GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> > +     if (IS_ERR(ctx->phy_reset_gpio)) {
> > +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not get reset GPIO\n");
> > +             return PTR_ERR(ctx->phy_reset_gpio);
> 
> You could use dev_err_probe() here.

Yes, I will use this.

> 
> regards
> Philipp

-- 
/Horatiu