From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47ABC433F5 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0A361212 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234995AbhJSUfi (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:35:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35406 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230147AbhJSUfg (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:35:36 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x335.google.com (mail-ot1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::335]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1E72C06161C for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x335.google.com with SMTP id l16-20020a9d6a90000000b0054e7ab56f27so5587736otq.12 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:33:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+4poghJVfR5IIyOI0aZxVj4qcymkEjZY6HDS+AxT1xI=; b=YeAF5weJGF7920fNVCJlPozj1e0pKIU1brMRC4cL7uf4ZMYs+sZDz2U986NdfT5sv1 HJq/AVucVc1aUAh6CN5uE0nYTuiCs1SLWhRp0LcnPlgoUu4BAIIhRJJP++OSqZjOuxcj Yrv0wvaIREN/XlvuV0Sch4mO9DR8HzCPrOzFnYjoQljU7IhgViNN1oHn/174buUZSiHl 8o75ofj0AevjJGWCnrPpjVrM6F7c+rtJn7rf8LAfu8l4SX5fRfrR3DIFxyFfiR1NNs4h ghOn6r37Z18Z/bATT7ik/kxNtmTuA0R4D3ILt17JQP9FQYOEWSZNCTbs6JzdXCQF7th5 qcmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+4poghJVfR5IIyOI0aZxVj4qcymkEjZY6HDS+AxT1xI=; b=Z5wGmbpQYtAoinfOVAcoynNEKQm7WWTuM1dL3FBcur1u3nRf2Q2ywlXtYpMMK5nJJ8 R2h3ulxKL//qKtFvqA9V9y46tn/8m+UZBxL30lhSw37D6TMSM5P9f0d309lkb7f8sHr/ EXzAYFc+3OhYNrU2aArs2McnQBpH26RBArt3P+idZ2xRPjZ3rAjS5u/EhxrwKGPtg+Mf zxGZ42sZ5d2WXdRoSVT9xIlQTpNJ+dan+zRe1VPRNZPQa2tDCYWn8+NNfuvdS5Y4jmNj hV+2mChw6kGNDqpItDkPTJhsBoojsKHj1jzYcgw1xZ7pz62pZalFkHKXpepg/ql0TdQI HRqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530QxjtAQDXPAq0jyMcSFb5T1hSu7XufPsWi7vuyAKJSSo1sdWBN ogduodLf9rQz3CBEuFZFLraA5FMgnuM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxC+XleAM98Bhn8sz4k/dhquAtK3nkPTJL/5FaKwp9CutmbT245GiT+3DENWp53u0+L1evHIw== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:728d:: with SMTP id t13mr7343655otj.370.1634675602952; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:33:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r184sm16936oia.38.2021.10.19.13.33.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:33:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:33:20 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 5.15-rc6 Message-ID: <20211019203320.GA748645@roeck-us.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 08:14:59PM -1000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So here we are, slightly later on a Sunday than usual due to travel, > but rc6 is out. > > I'd love to say that it's all looking average, but rc6 is actually > bigger han rc5 was, and larger than normal for this time in the > release cycle. > > It's not _enormously_ larger than normal, and it's not the largest rc6 > we've had, but it's still slightly worrisome. By rc6 I really do > expect things to have started calming down. > > I'm hoping it's just one of those random timing effects, with a couple > of slightly bigger pulls having come in the last week, and we'll see > the next week being extra quiet because rc6 got some of the stuff that > would normally have hit rc7. It happens. But let's see how this goes. > > The 5.15 cycle over-all remains one of the smaller cycles (at least > counting commits), so I wouldn't have expected this to be one that > requires an extra rc, but that may be what ends up happening unless > the upcoming week is really nice and calm. > > That said, nothing in here looks _particularly_ worrisome. It really > smells like just random timing effects to me, with networking, GPU > drivers, and ntfs3 all having had a somewhat active week. Other than > that it all really looks fairly normal. > > Full details in the shortlog below. > > Please give it a whirl. And let's hope for a nice calm next week and a > smaller rc7. > Build results: total: 153 pass: 149 fail: 4 Failed builds: alpha:allmodconfig m68k:allmodconfig parisc:allmodconfig s390:allmodconfig Qemu test results: total: 480 pass: 480 fail: The error is: Building alpha:allmodconfig ... failed -------------- Error log: :1517:2: warning: #warning syscall clone3 not implemented [-Wcpp] drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-slink.c:1197:12: error: 'tegra_slink_runtime_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] 1197 | static int tegra_slink_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) This was introduced by a bad conflict resolution between the following two patches. efafec27c565 spi: Fix tegra20 build with CONFIG_PM=n 2bab94090b01 spi: tegra20-slink: Declare runtime suspend and resume functions conditionally The fix is at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/spi-devel-general/patch/20211013144538.2346533-1-arnd@kernel.org/ and queued in -next. Guenter