linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: keescook@chromium.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	gor@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] stacktrace,sched: Make stack_trace_save_tsk() more robust
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:09:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211022152104.215612498@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20211022150933.883959987@infradead.org

Recent patches to get_wchan() made it more robust by only doing the
unwind when the task was blocked and serialized against wakeups.

Extract this functionality as a simpler companion to task_call_func()
named task_try_func() that really only cares about blocked tasks. Then
employ this new function to implement the same robustness for
ARCH_STACKWALK based stack_trace_save_tsk().

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 include/linux/wait.h |    1 
 kernel/sched/core.c  |   62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/stacktrace.c  |   13 ++++++----
 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -1162,5 +1162,6 @@ int autoremove_wake_function(struct wait
 
 typedef int (*task_call_f)(struct task_struct *p, void *arg);
 extern int task_call_func(struct task_struct *p, task_call_f func, void *arg);
+extern int task_try_func(struct task_struct *p, task_call_f func, void *arg);
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_WAIT_H */
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1966,21 +1966,21 @@ bool sched_task_on_rq(struct task_struct
 	return task_on_rq_queued(p);
 }
 
+static int try_get_wchan(struct task_struct *p, void *arg)
+{
+	unsigned long *wchan = arg;
+	*wchan = __get_wchan(p);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	unsigned long ip = 0;
-	unsigned int state;
 
 	if (!p || p == current)
 		return 0;
 
-	/* Only get wchan if task is blocked and we can keep it that way. */
-	raw_spin_lock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
-	state = READ_ONCE(p->__state);
-	smp_rmb(); /* see try_to_wake_up() */
-	if (state != TASK_RUNNING && state != TASK_WAKING && !p->on_rq)
-		ip = __get_wchan(p);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
+	task_try_func(p, try_get_wchan, &ip);
 
 	return ip;
 }
@@ -4184,6 +4184,52 @@ int task_call_func(struct task_struct *p
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * task_try_func - Invoke a function on task in blocked state
+ * @p: Process for which the function is to be invoked
+ * @func: Function to invoke
+ * @arg: Argument to function
+ *
+ * Fix the task in a blocked state, when possible. And if so, invoke @func on it.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  -EBUSY or whatever @func returns
+ */
+int task_try_func(struct task_struct *p, task_call_f func, void *arg)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned int state;
+	int ret = -EBUSY;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+
+	state = READ_ONCE(p->__state);
+
+	/*
+	 * Ensure we load p->on_rq after p->__state, otherwise it would be
+	 * possible to, falsely, observe p->on_rq == 0.
+	 *
+	 * See try_to_wake_up() for a longer comment.
+	 */
+	smp_rmb();
+
+	/*
+	 * Since pi->lock blocks try_to_wake_up(), we don't need rq->lock when
+	 * the task is blocked. Make sure to check @state since ttwu() can drop
+	 * locks at the end, see ttwu_queue_wakelist().
+	 */
+	if (state != TASK_RUNNING && state != TASK_WAKING && !p->on_rq) {
+		/*
+		 * The task is blocked and we're holding off wakeupsr. For any
+		 * of the other task states, see task_call_func().
+		 */
+		ret = func(p, arg);
+	}
+
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /**
  * wake_up_process - Wake up a specific process
  * @p: The process to be woken up.
--- a/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -123,6 +123,13 @@ unsigned int stack_trace_save(unsigned l
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stack_trace_save);
 
+static int try_arch_stack_walk_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, void *arg)
+{
+	stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry = stack_trace_consume_entry_nosched;
+	arch_stack_walk(consume_entry, arg, tsk, NULL);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * stack_trace_save_tsk - Save a task stack trace into a storage array
  * @task:	The task to examine
@@ -135,7 +142,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stack_trace_save);
 unsigned int stack_trace_save_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *store,
 				  unsigned int size, unsigned int skipnr)
 {
-	stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry = stack_trace_consume_entry_nosched;
 	struct stacktrace_cookie c = {
 		.store	= store,
 		.size	= size,
@@ -143,11 +149,8 @@ unsigned int stack_trace_save_tsk(struct
 		.skip	= skipnr + (current == tsk),
 	};
 
-	if (!try_get_task_stack(tsk))
-		return 0;
+	task_try_func(tsk, try_arch_stack_walk_tsk, &c);
 
-	arch_stack_walk(consume_entry, &c, tsk, NULL);
-	put_task_stack(tsk);
 	return c.len;
 }
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-22 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-22 15:09 [PATCH 0/7] arch: More wchan fixes Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86: Fix __get_wchan() for !STACKTRACE Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:25   ` Kees Cook
2021-10-26 19:16   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-10-22 16:25   ` [PATCH 2/7] stacktrace,sched: Make stack_trace_save_tsk() more robust Kees Cook
2021-10-22 16:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:57       ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 16:54     ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 17:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-25 20:38         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-25 20:52           ` Kees Cook
2021-10-26  9:33           ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-25 16:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM: implement ARCH_STACKWALK Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:18   ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] arch: Make ARCH_STACKWALK independent of STACKTRACE Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:18   ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 16:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 17:06   ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 5/7] powerpc, arm64: Mark __switch_to() as __sched Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:15   ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 17:40   ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] arch: __get_wchan() || ARCH_STACKWALK Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 16:13   ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22 17:52   ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-22 15:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] selftests: proc: Make sure wchan works when it exists Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-22 15:27 ` [PATCH 0/7] arch: More wchan fixes Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211022152104.215612498@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).