From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>,
Yun-Chien Yu <yun-chien.yu@mediatek.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] usb: xhci: skip re-check pending port event if hibernated
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 19:42:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211025114209.4047-1-chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> (raw)
When xHCI controller hibernated, the root hub lost power, if controller
support Port Power Control (PPC), PP is not set at xhci_resume() and
set by hub_reset_resume() later, so no need check pending port event.
If PPC is not supported, device is disconneced, seems do not send out
U3 LFPS wake signal, no need re-check again and drop 120ms delay to
save resume time.
Reported-by: Yun-Chien Yu <yun-chien.yu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index f3dabd02382c..a7a2bf5bc208 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ int xhci_resume(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, bool hibernated)
* the first wake signalling failed, give it that chance.
*/
pending_portevent = xhci_pending_portevent(xhci);
- if (!pending_portevent) {
+ if (!pending_portevent && !hibernated) {
msleep(120);
pending_portevent = xhci_pending_portevent(xhci);
}
--
2.18.0
reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211025114209.4047-1-chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
--to=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=yun-chien.yu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).