From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: x86: Use static calls to reduce kvm_pmu_ops overhead
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 19:10:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211108111032.24457-8-likexu@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211108111032.24457-1-likexu@tencent.com>
From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Convert kvm_pmu_ops to use static calls.
Here are the worst sched_clock() nanosecond numbers for the kvm_pmu_ops
functions that is most often called (up to 7 digits of calls) when running
a single perf test case in a guest on an ICX 2.70GHz host (mitigations=on):
| legacy | static call
------------------------------------------------------------
.pmc_idx_to_pmc | 10946 | 10047 (8%)
.pmc_is_enabled | 11291 | 11175 (1%)
.msr_idx_to_pmc | 13526 | 12346 (8%)
.is_valid_msr | 10895 | 10484 (3%)
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index bfdd9f2bc0fa..c86ff3057e2c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel)
ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_CMASK |
HSW_IN_TX |
HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED))) {
- config = kvm_pmu_ops.find_arch_event(pmc_to_pmu(pmc),
+ config = static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_find_arch_event)(pmc_to_pmu(pmc),
event_select,
unit_mask);
if (config != PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX)
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ void reprogram_fixed_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u8 ctrl, int idx)
pmc->current_config = (u64)ctrl;
pmc_reprogram_counter(pmc, PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
- kvm_pmu_ops.find_fixed_event(idx),
+ static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_find_fixed_event)(idx),
!(en_field & 0x2), /* exclude user */
!(en_field & 0x1), /* exclude kernel */
pmi, false, false);
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reprogram_fixed_counter);
void reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx)
{
- struct kvm_pmc *pmc = kvm_pmu_ops.pmc_idx_to_pmc(pmu, pmc_idx);
+ struct kvm_pmc *pmc = static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_pmc_idx_to_pmc)(pmu, pmc_idx);
if (!pmc)
return;
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int bit;
for_each_set_bit(bit, pmu->reprogram_pmi, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
- struct kvm_pmc *pmc = kvm_pmu_ops.pmc_idx_to_pmc(pmu, bit);
+ struct kvm_pmc *pmc = static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_pmc_idx_to_pmc)(pmu, bit);
if (unlikely(!pmc || !pmc->perf_event)) {
clear_bit(bit, pmu->reprogram_pmi);
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* check if idx is a valid index to access PMU */
int kvm_pmu_is_valid_rdpmc_ecx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx)
{
- return kvm_pmu_ops.is_valid_rdpmc_ecx(vcpu, idx);
+ return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_is_valid_rdpmc_ecx)(vcpu, idx);
}
bool is_vmware_backdoor_pmc(u32 pmc_idx)
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ int kvm_pmu_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx, u64 *data)
if (is_vmware_backdoor_pmc(idx))
return kvm_pmu_rdpmc_vmware(vcpu, idx, data);
- pmc = kvm_pmu_ops.rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc(vcpu, idx, &mask);
+ pmc = static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc)(vcpu, idx, &mask);
if (!pmc)
return 1;
@@ -396,23 +396,22 @@ int kvm_pmu_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx, u64 *data)
void kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu)) {
- if (kvm_pmu_ops.deliver_pmi)
- kvm_pmu_ops.deliver_pmi(vcpu);
+ static_call_cond(kvm_x86_pmu_deliver_pmi)(vcpu);
kvm_apic_local_deliver(vcpu->arch.apic, APIC_LVTPC);
}
}
bool kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
{
- return kvm_pmu_ops.msr_idx_to_pmc(vcpu, msr) ||
- kvm_pmu_ops.is_valid_msr(vcpu, msr);
+ return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_msr_idx_to_pmc)(vcpu, msr) ||
+ static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_is_valid_msr)(vcpu, msr);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr);
static void kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
- struct kvm_pmc *pmc = kvm_pmu_ops.msr_idx_to_pmc(vcpu, msr);
+ struct kvm_pmc *pmc = static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_msr_idx_to_pmc)(vcpu, msr);
if (pmc)
__set_bit(pmc->idx, pmu->pmc_in_use);
@@ -420,13 +419,13 @@ static void kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
{
- return kvm_pmu_ops.get_msr(vcpu, msr_info);
+ return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_get_msr)(vcpu, msr_info);
}
int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
{
kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(vcpu, msr_info->index);
- return kvm_pmu_ops.set_msr(vcpu, msr_info);
+ return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_set_msr)(vcpu, msr_info);
}
/* refresh PMU settings. This function generally is called when underlying
@@ -435,7 +434,7 @@ int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
*/
void kvm_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- kvm_pmu_ops.refresh(vcpu);
+ static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_refresh)(vcpu);
}
void kvm_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -443,7 +442,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
irq_work_sync(&pmu->irq_work);
- kvm_pmu_ops.reset(vcpu);
+ static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_reset)(vcpu);
}
void kvm_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -451,7 +450,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
memset(pmu, 0, sizeof(*pmu));
- kvm_pmu_ops.init(vcpu);
+ static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_init)(vcpu);
init_irq_work(&pmu->irq_work, kvm_pmi_trigger_fn);
pmu->event_count = 0;
pmu->need_cleanup = false;
@@ -483,14 +482,13 @@ void kvm_pmu_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
pmu->pmc_in_use, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
for_each_set_bit(i, bitmask, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
- pmc = kvm_pmu_ops.pmc_idx_to_pmc(pmu, i);
+ pmc = static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_pmc_idx_to_pmc)(pmu, i);
if (pmc && pmc->perf_event && !pmc_speculative_in_use(pmc))
pmc_stop_counter(pmc);
}
- if (kvm_pmu_ops.cleanup)
- kvm_pmu_ops.cleanup(vcpu);
+ static_call_cond(kvm_x86_pmu_cleanup)(vcpu);
bitmap_zero(pmu->pmc_in_use, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
index 40e0b523637b..a4bfd4200d67 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static inline bool pmc_is_fixed(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
static inline bool pmc_is_enabled(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
- return kvm_pmu_ops.pmc_is_enabled(pmc);
+ return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_pmc_is_enabled)(pmc);
}
static inline bool kvm_valid_perf_global_ctrl(struct kvm_pmu *pmu,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 70dc8f41329c..c5db444d5f4a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -11306,6 +11306,11 @@ static inline void kvm_ops_static_call_update(void)
static_call_update(kvm_x86_##func, kvm_x86_ops.func)
#define KVM_X86_OP_NULL KVM_X86_OP
#include <asm/kvm-x86-ops.h>
+
+#define KVM_X86_PMU_OP(func) \
+ static_call_update(kvm_x86_pmu_##func, kvm_pmu_ops.func)
+#define KVM_X86_PMU_OP_NULL KVM_X86_PMU_OP
+#include <asm/kvm-x86-pmu-ops.h>
}
int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void *opaque)
--
2.33.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-08 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-08 11:10 [PATCH v2 0/7] Use static_call for kvm_pmu_ops Like Xu
2021-11-08 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: x86: Export kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr() for nVMX Like Xu
2021-12-08 17:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-08 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: x86: Fix WARNING that macros should not use a trailing semicolon Like Xu
2021-11-08 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: x86: Move kvm_ops_static_call_update() to x86.c Like Xu
2021-11-08 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: x86: Copy kvm_pmu_ops by value to eliminate layer of indirection Like Xu
2021-12-08 18:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-08 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: x86: Move .pmu_ops to kvm_x86_init_ops and tagged as __initdata Like Xu
2021-12-08 18:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-08 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: x86: Introduce definitions to support static calls for kvm_pmu_ops Like Xu
2021-12-08 18:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-09 12:50 ` Like Xu
2021-11-08 11:10 ` Like Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211108111032.24457-8-likexu@tencent.com \
--to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).