From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, dvyukov@google.com, seanjc@google.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, mbenes@suse.cz, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/22] x86,word-at-a-time: Remove .fixup usage
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 22:07:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211109210736.GV174703@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdn8yrRopXyfd299=SwZS9TAPfPj4apYgdCnzPb20knhbg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 11:22:44AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> I think the use of this feature (label-attributes) here isn't
> necessary though; because of the use of outputs, the "fallthrough"
> basic block needs to be placed immediately after the basic block
> terminated by the asm goto, at least in LLVM. Was different ordering
> of basic blocks observed with GCC without this label attribute?
GCC does the same, but I wanted to have the exception stuff be in
.text.cold, but alas it doesn't do that. I left the attribute because of
it's descriptive value.
> Unless the cold attribute is helping move
> ("shrink-wrap"?) the basic block to a whole other section
> (.text.cold.)?
I was hoping it would do that, but it doesn't on gcc-11.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-09 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-05 17:10 [PATCH 00/22] x86: Remove anonymous out-of-line fixups Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 01/22] bitfield.h: Fix "type of reg too small for mask" test Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 02/22] x86,mmx_32: Remove .fixup usage Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 03/22] x86,copy_user_64: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 04/22] x86,copy_mc_64: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 05/22] x86,entry_64: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 06/22] x86,entry_32: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 07/22] x86,extable: Extend extable functionality Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 08/22] x86,msr: Remove .fixup usage Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 09/22] x86,futex: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 10/22] x86,uaccess: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 11/22] x86,xen: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 12/22] x86,fpu: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 13/22] x86,segment: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 14/22] x86,vmx: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 15/22] x86,checksum_32: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 16/22] x86,sgx: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 17/22] x86,kvm: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 18/22] x86,usercopy_32: Simplify __copy_user_intel_nocache() Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 19/22] x86,usercopy: Remove .fixup usage Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 20/22] x86,word-at-a-time: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 18:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-05 18:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-08 16:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-08 18:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-08 18:53 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-11-09 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 19:22 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-11-09 20:59 ` Bill Wendling
2021-11-09 21:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 21:25 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-11-09 22:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 22:15 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-11-09 21:07 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-11-10 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-10 10:46 ` David Laight
2021-11-10 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-10 12:20 ` David Laight
2021-11-12 1:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-12 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-13 5:35 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-15 12:36 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-11-15 13:01 ` Joe Lawrence
2021-11-15 23:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-16 7:25 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-11-15 12:59 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-11-16 21:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-18 7:15 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-11-22 17:46 ` Petr Mladek
2021-11-24 17:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-25 8:18 ` Petr Mladek
2021-11-10 12:14 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 21/22] x86: Remove .fixup section Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 22/22] objtool: Remove .fixup handling Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211109210736.GV174703@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).