linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
To: <richard@nod.at>, <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	<miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	<mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 02/12] ubifs: Fix deadlock in concurrent rename whiteout and inode writeback
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 20:17:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211112121758.2208727-3-chengzhihao1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211112121758.2208727-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com>

Following hung tasks:
[   77.028764] task:kworker/u8:4    state:D stack:    0 pid:  132
[   77.028820] Call Trace:
[   77.029027]  schedule+0x8c/0x1b0
[   77.029067]  mutex_lock+0x50/0x60
[   77.029074]  ubifs_write_inode+0x68/0x1f0 [ubifs]
[   77.029117]  __writeback_single_inode+0x43c/0x570
[   77.029128]  writeback_sb_inodes+0x259/0x740
[   77.029148]  wb_writeback+0x107/0x4d0
[   77.029163]  wb_workfn+0x162/0x7b0

[   92.390442] task:aa              state:D stack:    0 pid: 1506
[   92.390448] Call Trace:
[   92.390458]  schedule+0x8c/0x1b0
[   92.390461]  wb_wait_for_completion+0x82/0xd0
[   92.390469]  __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0xb2/0x110
[   92.390472]  writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x14/0x20
[   92.390476]  ubifs_budget_space+0x705/0xdd0 [ubifs]
[   92.390503]  do_rename.cold+0x7f/0x187 [ubifs]
[   92.390549]  ubifs_rename+0x8b/0x180 [ubifs]
[   92.390571]  vfs_rename+0xdb2/0x1170
[   92.390580]  do_renameat2+0x554/0x770

, are caused by concurrent rename whiteout and inode writeback processes:
	rename_whiteout(Thread 1)	        wb_workfn(Thread2)
ubifs_rename
  do_rename
    lock_4_inodes (Hold ui_mutex)
    ubifs_budget_space
      make_free_space
        shrink_liability
	  __writeback_inodes_sb_nr
	    bdi_split_work_to_wbs (Queue new wb work)
					      wb_do_writeback(wb work)
						__writeback_single_inode
					          ubifs_write_inode
					            LOCK(ui_mutex)
							   ↑
	      wb_wait_for_completion (Wait wb work) <-- deadlock!

Reproducer (Detail program in [Link]):
  1. SYS_renameat2("/mp/dir/file", "/mp/dir/whiteout", RENAME_WHITEOUT)
  2. Consume out of space before kernel(mdelay) doing budget for whiteout

Fix it by doing whiteout space budget before locking ubifs inodes.
BTW, it also fixes wrong goto tag 'out_release' in whiteout budget
error handling path(It should at least recover dir i_size and unlock
4 ubifs inodes).

Fixes: 9e0a1fff8db56ea ("ubifs: Implement RENAME_WHITEOUT")
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214733
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
---
 fs/ubifs/dir.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
index cfa8881d8cca..2735ad1affed 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
@@ -1324,6 +1324,7 @@ static int do_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
 
 	if (flags & RENAME_WHITEOUT) {
 		union ubifs_dev_desc *dev = NULL;
+		struct ubifs_budget_req wht_req;
 
 		dev = kmalloc(sizeof(union ubifs_dev_desc), GFP_NOFS);
 		if (!dev) {
@@ -1345,6 +1346,20 @@ static int do_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
 		whiteout_ui->data = dev;
 		whiteout_ui->data_len = ubifs_encode_dev(dev, MKDEV(0, 0));
 		ubifs_assert(c, !whiteout_ui->dirty);
+
+		memset(&wht_req, 0, sizeof(struct ubifs_budget_req));
+		wht_req.dirtied_ino = 1;
+		wht_req.dirtied_ino_d = ALIGN(whiteout_ui->data_len, 8);
+		/*
+		 * To avoid deadlock between space budget (holds ui_mutex and
+		 * waits wb work) and writeback work(waits ui_mutex), do space
+		 * budget before ubifs inodes locked.
+		 */
+		err = ubifs_budget_space(c, &wht_req);
+		if (err) {
+			iput(whiteout);
+			goto out_release;
+		}
 	}
 
 	lock_4_inodes(old_dir, new_dir, new_inode, whiteout);
@@ -1419,16 +1434,6 @@ static int do_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
 	}
 
 	if (whiteout) {
-		struct ubifs_budget_req wht_req = { .dirtied_ino = 1,
-				.dirtied_ino_d = \
-				ALIGN(ubifs_inode(whiteout)->data_len, 8) };
-
-		err = ubifs_budget_space(c, &wht_req);
-		if (err) {
-			iput(whiteout);
-			goto out_release;
-		}
-
 		inc_nlink(whiteout);
 		mark_inode_dirty(whiteout);
 
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-12 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-12 12:17 [PATCH v3 00/12] Some bugfixs for ubi/ubifs Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-12 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] ubifs: rename_whiteout: Fix double free for whiteout_ui->data Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-12 12:17 ` Zhihao Cheng [this message]
2021-11-12 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] ubifs: Fix wrong number of inodes locked by ui_mutex in ubifs_inode comment Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-12 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ubifs: Add missing iput if do_tmpfile() failed in rename whiteout Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-15  8:24   ` Sascha Hauer
2021-11-15  9:03     ` Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-15  9:20     ` Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-12 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ubifs: Rename whiteout atomically Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-12 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] ubifs: Fix 'ui->dirty' race between do_tmpfile() and writeback work Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-12 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ubifs: Rectify space amount budget for mkdir/tmpfile operations Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-12 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ubifs: setflags: Make dirtied_ino_d 8 bytes aligned Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-12 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ubifs: Fix read out-of-bounds in ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock() Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-12 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ubifs: Fix to add refcount once page is set private Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-12 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ubi: fastmap: Return error code if memory allocation fails in add_aeb() Zhihao Cheng
2021-11-12 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ubi: fastmap: Add all fastmap pebs into 'ai->fastmap' when fm->used_blocks>=2 Zhihao Cheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211112121758.2208727-3-chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --to=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).