From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preemption model accessors
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 18:52:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211112185203.280040-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211112185203.280040-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com>
CONFIG_PREEMPT{_NONE, _VOLUNTARY} designate either:
o The build-time preemption model when !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
o The default boot-time preemption model when PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
IOW, using those on PREEMPT_DYNAMIC kernels is meaningless - the actual
model could have been set to something else by the "preempt=foo" cmdline
parameter. Same problem applies to CONFIG_PREEMPTION.
Introduce a set of helpers to determine the actual preemption model used by
the live kernel.
Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 5f8db54226af..e8e884ee6e8b 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2073,6 +2073,47 @@ static inline void cond_resched_rcu(void)
#endif
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
+
+extern bool preempt_model_none(void);
+extern bool preempt_model_voluntary(void);
+extern bool preempt_model_full(void);
+
+#else
+
+static inline bool preempt_model_none(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE);
+}
+static inline bool preempt_model_voluntary(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY);
+}
+static inline bool preempt_model_full(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT);
+}
+
+#endif
+
+static inline bool preempt_model_rt(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Does the preemption model allow non-cooperative preemption?
+ *
+ * For !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC kernels this is an exact match with
+ * CONFIG_PREEMPTION; for CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC this doesn't work as the
+ * kernel is *built* with CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y but may run with e.g. the
+ * PREEMPT_NONE model.
+ */
+static inline bool preempt_model_preemptible(void)
+{
+ return preempt_model_full() || preempt_model_rt();
+}
+
/*
* Does a critical section need to be broken due to another
* task waiting?: (technically does not depend on CONFIG_PREEMPTION,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 97047aa7b6c2..e2502b8643b4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6638,6 +6638,18 @@ static void __init preempt_dynamic_init(void)
}
}
+#define PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(mode) \
+ bool preempt_model_##mode(void) \
+ { \
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(preempt_dynamic_mode == preempt_dynamic_undefined); \
+ return preempt_dynamic_mode == preempt_dynamic_##mode; \
+ } \
+ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_model_##mode)
+
+PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(none);
+PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(voluntary);
+PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(full);
+
#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
static inline void preempt_dynamic_init(void) { }
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-12 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-12 18:51 [PATCH v3 0/4] preempt: PREEMPT vs PREEMPT_DYNAMIC configs fixup Valentin Schneider
2021-11-12 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] preempt: Restore preemption model selection configs Valentin Schneider
2021-11-12 18:52 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2021-11-15 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preemption model accessors Marco Elver
2022-04-05 8:29 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Valentin Schneider
2021-11-12 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] kcsan: Use " Valentin Schneider
2022-04-05 8:29 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Valentin Schneider
2021-11-12 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ftrace: Use preemption model accessors for trace header printout Valentin Schneider
2022-04-05 8:29 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Valentin Schneider
2022-03-14 22:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] preempt: PREEMPT vs PREEMPT_DYNAMIC configs fixup Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211112185203.280040-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).