Hello,

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 02:04:26AM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@zte.com.cn>
> 
> do_div() does a 64-by-32 division. If the divisor is unsigned long, using
> div64_ul can avoid truncation to 32-bit.

After some research I understood your commit log. I'd write:

	do_div() does a 64-by-32 division. Here the divsor is an
	unsigned long which on some platforms is 64 bit wide. So use
	div64_ul instead of do_div to avoid a possible truncation.

The priority of this patch seems to be low, as the device seems to exist
only on (32bit) arm.

> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c
> index a43b2babc809..1ae3d73b9832 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-hlcdc.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>  				return -EINVAL;
>  
>  			clk_period_ns = (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * 256;
> -			do_div(clk_period_ns, clk_freq);
> +			div64_ul(clk_period_ns, clk_freq);

This must be

	clk_period_ns = div64_ul(clk_period_ns, clk_freq);

as div64_ul has a different calling convention than do_div. Same problem
in the next hunk.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |