From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11B3C433FE for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239818AbhKVPPp (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:15:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55878 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239771AbhKVPPo (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:15:44 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A905AC061714 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 07:12:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id z18so23772105iof.5 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 07:12:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=i/Ts0Os9qMFGThwHOtCiyhHMh/4YYH+c2424NHLIYCM=; b=badXmSjTu1JoDNUZ9NDIV7spgpAjIoEfdD9ic1e77G7P2LHAXwYp9epDLMgiUYLnav 9W69UkENu4Ov86ohNMq2B2JZdBNLHZT4aDyzuF8gynIyOdI/0+WDNUWSX3Wag4aEMjqT mP5w8mu7pAseUIlqrlv7cZ6id4iI2ZPVTwQBw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=i/Ts0Os9qMFGThwHOtCiyhHMh/4YYH+c2424NHLIYCM=; b=VBNfX5OnPM1VE3EhPmQ0AZB1dhguurd5vGYrH6/k5KJ+1PBmv7Rv566ThelnWY6raw U6TBLarwlAM8h46PkCiW2HK8DBh+Uka0QGgtgS8poRzaVB7kZrpdBmFBFTffPZWNK+Vq ZTZwiIvnxA6NI4zZdZxAdC/3lgCaZ5TRzrJIy5DdYrVr/1AVzlX/d1/ZZqVuu0YWf3Vs 0sbc4uEfa5tPfYMCjwlYCJolQpWQDSLhYUHmqT09SidbJBNPIE4jbOCi723UmwV4vuMX cdOYzZrlHsua1C6lD2LMxtR6Ei/X2JDQg4F/+hm6pBmRDcwb9F86aZIANwchgkH0rFMl i8ew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310f2knnUSJSkU8Kli7nkoKabP7AXcjUinydxbr90M0fwpaGeed 3vpoZyAJbrZ6r3+ZpZc4tXy4wg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbnPYUWBVjPezWcamXeiCUf/myETmHg+GaUYaQq5hNj/HU+vHelq4BAjqnuTeQmqLr7JkmGA== X-Received: by 2002:a02:6064:: with SMTP id d36mr49689614jaf.80.1637593956072; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 07:12:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from meerkat.local (bras-base-mtrlpq5031w-grc-32-216-209-220-181.dsl.bell.ca. [216.209.220.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f5sm5198012ioo.34.2021.11.22.07.12.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 07:12:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:12:33 -0500 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/1] Create 'Reported:' and 'Reviewed:' tags for links in commit messages Message-ID: <20211122151233.54xtnpwdmnrdj3jf@meerkat.local> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 08:33:41AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > The following patch proposes to create two new tags for mentioning links in > commit messages. They are meant to make it obvious what provided links are > about, which is useful for both users and scripts studying commits. > > The new tag 'Reported:' is meant to be used for linking to bug reports, while > 'Reviewed:' should point to the last review of the patch in question. They > supplement 'Link:', which until now has been used for these two as well as other > purposes; it stays around for the latter use case, for example for links to PDFs > or webpages with background information relevant for the patch. As an alternative, I can offer that we continue to use Link: trailers with extra data following the hashtag, as is already done for other trailers: Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215101 #report Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fobarbaz.5551212@localhost #review Note, that this merely for completeness, not in opposition to the proposal. I find the "Link:" trailer to be semantically redundant, since what follows is already clearly a hyperlink. Adding "Link: " in front of it is only necessary for consistency and machine parsing reasons. Regards, -K