From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D87C433F5 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238269AbhKWOxT (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:53:19 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:38644 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233112AbhKWOxR (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:53:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:50:06 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1637679007; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vwnOCI+L+B20iIZ44o/E6m8Rm/1smT3oBiLTmdpwUYU=; b=sDjeOJx56OO+a6iNaTtYNZLIZkoWZ8KkYGaaqIBk3jBVZOMCzhsxbhoE4dcnZaAezL2zoO UebXzP+5tCuWZn0gbgsku8TfqMwxWuWP2/tIj58w8jPFMw0pvGe8KiAftc3HLHTnWInUbR NTKriFyP2HeQUwkqnHeuwLU8TDVFrGIBlx7/7NbmDiB3MVSgPgFoN5hKBsNg2+4LZv2aeH kXG7QAS79t7USuDeE6dKMjwZ56AMl6f9vjP3Ewecvf56kFd43Y/NJKbACfpVzFhojPSeJ9 3JmQFgumt1oFj7AYkL3GQGvEMF0v4DWw4lFzJNkNlXV4jwq3eMu0F3154nRRAw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1637679007; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vwnOCI+L+B20iIZ44o/E6m8Rm/1smT3oBiLTmdpwUYU=; b=6aE+5JtfaqdDSPnOH9qRB61+IjPm1E7I4EWXam35206nLoKs1vVya6voSkw7o4J9PK77rM kIufRD2m++OPbxDQ== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Naresh Kamboju , Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , Linux-sh list , Stephen Rothwell , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton , Mike Galbraith , Sergey Senozhatsky , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested' Message-ID: <20211123145006.bon3usz4ilhw6ymg@linutronix.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021-11-23 15:48:34 [+0100], Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Except for: > > kernel/locking/spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of > function '__raw_write_lock_nested'; did you mean > '_raw_write_lock_nested'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 306 | __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | _raw_write_lock_nested > > Which was also reported for other architectures: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/202111201111.c2ApGeHR-lkp@intel.com/ I'm on it. Almost done. > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert Sebastian