From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EE3C433FE for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238849AbhKWREr (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:04:47 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:39342 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236804AbhKWREq (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:04:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:01:34 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1637686896; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5jFMme/04un1MC+akjG19ft3gjyZIh6NNG67wIsGBMo=; b=DWS4D674L2kcCxpVr2gQnGTSt089zQTRUODvs710sbsaPBVwWxmkwNuKrbOy4wEJK0FWXr viw6gpMlbmrxzNVhr93KpKqgAvWb8TX1jnwVSG1DvDw+aesfYj/H+PY/PmHS04sttfAb7R /pVrAtYs5SX5tJxLDjYlft9xh4yE5RzAdIJUJ7uNZg2l4A1Ku8YSHmTImfr4ZstCAWq551 3hHZH54+sfMEERCJRTLCS2u7YgK6YlUrxSU70yDE/iWEGvguh2OEJDXwxor5KulIF9X3/V v/tHoKbLPgJyYH1eT+tnSRW2155Wdz1aLrRPJ8NIfylnH/5XZD0IXOP4mOVP5Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1637686896; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5jFMme/04un1MC+akjG19ft3gjyZIh6NNG67wIsGBMo=; b=5NQ/WwFssLtEYCocJv/AX/sNqGciWZW0BXPldn61pNctmEPKDPC4pRCTVR21gg89alilv0 ZVHPUVGpYAMa7bBg== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Naresh Kamboju , Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , Linux-sh list , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Minchan Kim , Mike Galbraith , Sergey Senozhatsky , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org Subject: [PATCH v2] locking: Fixup write_lock_nested() implementation. Message-ID: <20211123170134.y6xb7pmpgdn4m3bn@linutronix.de> References: <20211123145006.bon3usz4ilhw6ymg@linutronix.de> <20211123160712.fssioyabln5erx2u@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20211123160712.fssioyabln5erx2u@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew, please merge it into: locking/rwlocks: introduce write_lock_nested locking-rwlocks-introduce-write_lock_nested.patch And if someone could test it, I get sh4 defconfig built with and without lockdep. x86 seems still to build, too. So it can't be that bad. v1=E2=80=A6v2: I noticed a typo in _raw_write_lock_nested() and decided tha= t it is no needed so now it is removed for !CONFIG_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior --- include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h | 1 - kernel/locking/spinlock.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h b/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h index f0c535ec4e654..dceb0a59b6927 100644 --- a/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h +++ b/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ _raw_write_unlock_irqrestore(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned lon= g flags) =20 #ifdef CONFIG_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK #define _raw_write_lock(lock) __raw_write_lock(lock) -#define _raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass) __raw_write_lock_nested(loc= k, subclass) #endif =20 #ifdef CONFIG_INLINE_READ_LOCK_BH diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c index 996811efa6d6e..7f49baaa49793 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c @@ -301,6 +301,10 @@ void __lockfunc _raw_write_lock(rwlock_t *lock) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(_raw_write_lock); =20 +#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC +#define __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass) __raw_write_lock(((void)(s= ubclass), (lock))) +#endif + void __lockfunc _raw_write_lock_nested(rwlock_t *lock, int subclass) { __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass); --=20 2.34.0