From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E815C433FE for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 03:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236665AbhKXDP6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 22:15:58 -0500 Received: from smtp161.vfemail.net ([146.59.185.161]:41659 "EHLO smtp161.vfemail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233913AbhKXDP4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 22:15:56 -0500 Received: (qmail 5375 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2021 03:12:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO nl101-3.vfemail.net) () by smtpout.vfemail.net with ESMTPS (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted); 24 Nov 2021 03:12:46 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=vfemail.net; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=2018; bh=IJ3maCvdDBep jC+VBuaf0rHuv1D9SuN0aOu4sfd9Jv4=; b=osAgjpo4m744VjIPhGLKafh+T+Im p4Fh3cZC90BZYEykSyF/eVJIatr+BWkgI3VAFH+XlnFn5lcAZkAIYngMd8fLP+k+ zZOOlOQTtkaZKidiV/eA2qGKR3/xXFIoBiM7di0g+MfP9q7UGkEyG4ThAV9C/yTF Mzm8d1gIitOQt/0= Received: (qmail 72259 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2021 03:12:16 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 72241, pid: 72253, t: 0.4285s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO bmwxMDEudmZlbWFpbC5uZXQ=) (aGdudGt3aXNAdmZlbWFpbC5uZXQ=@MTkyLjE2OC4xLjE5Mg==) by nl101.vfemail.net with ESMTPA; 24 Nov 2021 03:12:15 -0000 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 22:12:41 -0500 From: David Niklas To: Benjamin Tissoires Cc: Filipe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?La=EDns?= , Alan Stern , Jiri Kosina , lkml , Linux USB Mailing List , "open list:HID CORE LAYER" Subject: Re: I need advice with UPS connection. (ping) Message-ID: <20211123221241.3cdb4e66@Zen-II-x12.niklas.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20201109220000.2ae98fa5@Phenom-II-x6.niklas.com> <20211114144842.72463ccc@Zen-II-x12.niklas.com> <20211114211435.GA87082@rowland.harvard.edu> <20211114220222.31755871@Zen-II-x12.niklas.com> <20211115160918.GB109771@rowland.harvard.edu> <20211117002359.03b36ec6@Zen-II-x12.niklas.com> <20211117170817.GD172151@rowland.harvard.edu> <20211119171915.6a8cac47@Zen-II-x12.niklas.com> <20211122112526.501c5f66@Zen-II-x12.niklas.com> <667c2c8307e0e738ed54e34f6c83ea1df99c7528.camel@archlinux.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:33:08 +0100 Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:35 PM Filipe La=C3=ADns > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 15:13 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: =20 > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:25:26AM -0500, David Niklas wrote: =20 > > > > Ok, I first edited the kernel to return -ENOMEM like you > > > > suggested but the UPS still disconnected. I then edited it again > > > > to re-add the 1060 byte request and the UPS still disconnected. > > > > > > > > I'm attaching the usbmon traces. > > > > If you need any additional info I'll do my best to provide it. =20 > > > > > > Holy cow! I just realized what's going on. And these little > > > changes we've been messing around with have nothing to do with it. > > > > > > For the first time, I looked at the timestamps in the usbmon > > > traces. It turns out that the disconnects occur several seconds > > > after the kernel retrieves the HID report descriptor from the > > > device. Under normal conditions we would expect to see report > > > packets coming in from the device, starting just a fraction of a > > > second after the descriptor is received. But that isn't happening > > > in the Linux traces, whereas it does happen in the Windows pcap log. > > > > > > I would guess that the UPS is programmed to disconnect itself > > > electronically from the USB bus if it doesn't get any requests for > > > reports within a couple of seconds. That certainly would explain > > > what you've been seeing. I can't imagine why it would be > > > programmed to behave this way, but companies have been known to do > > > stranger things. > > > > > > As for why the kernel doesn't try to get the reports... That's a > > > little harder to answer. Maybe Jiri or Benjamin will know > > > something about it. =20 >=20 > I am not sure exactly what is going on there. > There are a couple of things that come to my mind: > - for quite some time now, we don't fetch all reports whenever we > connect a new device. This was known to be problematic on some devices > (see all the devices with HID_QUIRK_NOGET or > HID_QUIRK_NO_INIT_REPORT), and the default to not poll input values on > plug for devices is actually safer. If you want to revert, we will > have to have a special driver for this one I guess > - HID_QUIRK_ALWAYS_POLL *might* be a way to force the device to stay > with a USB connection up. >=20 > > > > > > The UPS's vendor ID is 0d9f (POWERCOM) and the product ID is 0004. > > > Now, the drivers/hid/hid-quirks.c file contains a quirk entry for > > > 0d9f:0002 (product POWERCOM_UPS), which is probably an earlier > > > model of the same device, or a very similar device. This quirk > > > entry is in the hid_ignore_list; it tells the HID core not to > > > handle the device at all. > > > > > > I don't know why that quirk entry is present, and furthermore, it > > > can't directly affect what is happening with your device because > > > the product IDs are different. Still, it is an indication that > > > something strange is going on behind the scenes. > > > > > > Perhaps there is no kernel driver for these UPS devices? Perhaps > > > the intention is that some user program will handle all the > > > communication when one of them is detected? A quick search on > > > Google turns up usbhid-ups, part of Network USB Tools (NUT) -- > > > maybe you need to install that package in order to use the device. =20 >=20 > I don't have enough experience with UPS here to be helpful, > unfortunately. But What Alan said made a lot of sense. Maybe the NUT > people will have a better insight. I'll send a message their way. Thanks, David