From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF0FC433FE for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 22:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240102AbhKWWze (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:55:34 -0500 Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org ([150.107.74.76]:46377 "EHLO gandalf.ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229574AbhKWWzd (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:55:33 -0500 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4HzKCS0FC6z4xR9; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:52:19 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1637707942; bh=nJ3v47D44xi4bEAxxkbK0bqu4F1ye/w5S9LdQhDunn4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lO6/hCKdQwbOUH0oetFG7UsGnAgEIqnJOQapPnQBGFzu8nlcwbpSTESmOzrme/9m3 0hl8HHecNnVoZvfQx6LtrT5wOrpPUmsmBVk8TDExdJIN5N0Im3QvkVjli6yGgCvEWW tIiaAVYIJJQXTB07OD/S+Mq+An0KshvUC1nIWBIXo/mLc7h88IML8yzXu34DQW9oZu GaYxGuHSBM/VawRO2vBrH/tRmrwo4sMo+yMmYV7aZWdx9/6k6v9mT9bLaXrgnczRYW 4CltoMs7jzL4q/0Z5OrX+JZcACdXY5I0Aic+K3zBKS1VkS6KTtQ2mVJwLq+rOfW4j9 bSV6sMZdpBLGQ== Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:52:18 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Naresh Kamboju , Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , Linux-sh list , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Minchan Kim , Mike Galbraith , Sergey Senozhatsky , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking: Fixup write_lock_nested() implementation. Message-ID: <20211124095218.4a83f39e@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20211123170134.y6xb7pmpgdn4m3bn@linutronix.de> References: <20211123145006.bon3usz4ilhw6ymg@linutronix.de> <20211123160712.fssioyabln5erx2u@linutronix.de> <20211123170134.y6xb7pmpgdn4m3bn@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/w9K6C0uM4PeS2VBEioL/GRL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/w9K6C0uM4PeS2VBEioL/GRL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:01:34 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > Andrew, please merge it into: > locking/rwlocks: introduce write_lock_nested > locking-rwlocks-introduce-write_lock_nested.patch >=20 > And if someone could test it, I get sh4 defconfig built with and without > lockdep. x86 seems still to build, too. So it can't be that bad. >=20 > v1=E2=80=A6v2: I noticed a typo in _raw_write_lock_nested() and decided t= hat it > is no needed so now it is removed for !CONFIG_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > --- > include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h | 1 - > kernel/locking/spinlock.c | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h b/include/linux/rwlock_api_sm= p.h > index f0c535ec4e654..dceb0a59b6927 100644 > --- a/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h > +++ b/include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h > @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ _raw_write_unlock_irqrestore(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned l= ong flags) > =20 > #ifdef CONFIG_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK > #define _raw_write_lock(lock) __raw_write_lock(lock) > -#define _raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass) __raw_write_lock_nested(l= ock, subclass) > #endif > =20 > #ifdef CONFIG_INLINE_READ_LOCK_BH > diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c > index 996811efa6d6e..7f49baaa49793 100644 > --- a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c > +++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c > @@ -301,6 +301,10 @@ void __lockfunc _raw_write_lock(rwlock_t *lock) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(_raw_write_lock); > =20 > +#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC > +#define __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass) __raw_write_lock(((void)= (subclass), (lock))) > +#endif > + > void __lockfunc _raw_write_lock_nested(rwlock_t *lock, int subclass) > { > __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass); > --=20 > 2.34.0 >=20 I have added that patch to iinux-next today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/w9K6C0uM4PeS2VBEioL/GRL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmGdcKIACgkQAVBC80lX 0GxcKwf8DSXSQ4vFx8KZgCNUsRDvQY9k0L1Anncmc+YDBzHVLsGNp1y16KV8RnFG EH3z7YUHfQXJw+IuwV+zVx4sScskhe0rsnYeevnobC9sYlBR1FWNczzXVL9l2Cy5 VT3OOvp3pP9voolA0ESmtt2jvROTpjX0jzIbDPE/kfkAwbzeypsp7oNPKRnc/19E h3oVYUIRteF/Z/ix3b5WEXhByTlVyHsTtvhnifDaIMY8GwERfpsVg86s159FTpgc DxpjChCd5a82fz/Xu8/4FgU97YAoJi8xchXIv+xwQU3Np6Z891N4dK8blRsk4ZSJ 4TE4qakICK1UDliAhxUa6Ec4DWnokg== =TnkZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/w9K6C0uM4PeS2VBEioL/GRL--