linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.16-rc3
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:02:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211129110202.GA23795@lpieralisi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53f0b09c-58b3-bd37-5309-5c43242cbecd@roeck-us.net>

On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 08:17:33PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/28/21 7:07 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 11/28/21 17:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 02:21:20PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > So rc3 is usually a bit larger than rc2 just because people had some
> > > > time to start finding things.
> > > > 
> > > > So too this time, although it's not like this is a particularly big
> > > > rc3. Possibly partly due to the past week having been Thanksgiving
> > > > week here in the US. But the size is well within the normal range, so
> > > > if that's a factor, it's not been a big one.
> > > > 
> > > > The diff for rc3 is mostly drivers, although part of that is just
> > > > because of the removal of a left-over MIPS Netlogic driver which makes
> > > > the stats look a bit wonky, and is over a third of the whole diff just
> > > > in itself.
> > > > 
> > > > If you ignore that part, the statistics look a bit more normal, but
> > > > drivers still dominate (network drivers, sound and gpu are the big
> > > > ones, but there is noise all over). Other than that there's once again
> > > > a fair amount of selftest (mostly networking), along with core
> > > > networking, some arch updates - the bulk of it from a single arm64
> > > > uaccess patch, although that's mostly because it's all pretty small -
> > > > and random other changes.
> > > > 
> > > > Full shortlog below.
> > > > 
> > > > Please test,
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Build results:
> > >     total: 153 pass: 152 fail: 1
> > > Failed builds:
> > >     mips:allmodconfig
> > > Qemu test results:
> > >     total: 482 pass: 482 fail: 0
> > > 
> > > Building mips:allmodconfig ... failed
> > > --------------
> > > Error log:
> > > ERROR: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.o
> > > ERROR: modpost: "mips_cm_unlock_other" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined!
> > > ERROR: modpost: "mips_cpc_base" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined!
> > > ERROR: modpost: "mips_cm_lock_other" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined!
> > > ERROR: modpost: "mips_cm_is64" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined!
> > > ERROR: modpost: "mips_gcr_base" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined!
> > > 
> > > There is still no fix for the mips:allmodconfig build problem as far
> > > as I can see. It is a bit odd, because the fix would be as simple as
> > > 
> > >   config PCIE_MT7621
> > > -    tristate "MediaTek MT7621 PCIe Controller"
> > > -    depends on (RALINK && SOC_MT7621) || (MIPS && COMPILE_TEST)
> > > +    bool "MediaTek MT7621 PCIe Controller"
> > > +    depends on SOC_MT7621 || (MIPS && COMPILE_TEST)
> > >       select PHY_MT7621_PCI
> > >       default SOC_MT7621
> > >       help
> > > 
> > > Context: tristate doesn't make sense here because both RALINK and
> > > SOC_MT7621 are bool. Also, RALINK is redundant because SOC_MT7621
> > > already depends on it. The compile failure is due to missing exported
> > > symbols, and it is only seen if PCIE_MT7621=m - which is only possible
> > > if COMPILE_TEST=y. In other words, the dependencies above are set such
> > > that test builds, and only test builds, fail.
> > > 
> > > The problem was introduced with commit 2bdd5238e756 ("PCI: mt7621:
> > > Add MediaTek MT7621 PCIe host controller driver"). Copying some of
> > > those responsible to see if we can expect a solution sometime soon.
> > 
> > 
> > I sent a patch for this a couple of weeks ago and Sergio replied to it
> > here:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/CAMhs-H8TA0S23FjSRKGKeKAWWdUxET6YnivLQoFuy_fSVJOPXw@mail.gmail.com/
> > 
> > saying that is a different patch out there but that it had not
> > been reviewed yet.
> > 
> 
> All proposals I have seen assume that PCIE_MT7621=m. As I said, I think
> that it is pointless to do that because the driver can only be built
> as module if COMPILE_TEST=y. We should not [have to] export symbols
> because of that.

Hi Sergio,

can we converge to a fix with this thread background in mind please ?

Thanks,
Lorenzo

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-29 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-28 22:21 Linux 5.16-rc3 Linus Torvalds
2021-11-29  1:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-29  3:07   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-11-29  4:17     ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-29 11:02       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2021-11-29 12:23         ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-11-29 12:18       ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-11-29 15:25         ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-01 20:38         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-12-01 20:50           ` Guenter Roeck
2021-12-01 21:38             ` Sergio Paracuellos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211129110202.GA23795@lpieralisi \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).