From: "Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: add the driver component name to the component struc
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 16:16:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211207161632.47ee0020@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ya9c0d/X0z1QUVN6@sirena.org.uk>
Mark,
On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 13:08:33 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 09:47:32AM +0100, Köry Maincent wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > > Why is one device registering multiple components in the first place?
>
> > Because the sound components are more and more complex. Why they shouldn't?
> >
>
> In what way are they more complex?
The sound hardware components add more and more features.
>
> > It seems to be already the case:
> > sound/soc/codecs/cros_ec_codec.c
> > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_easrc.c
> > sound/soc/mediatek/mt*/mt*-afe-pcm.c
> > sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-codec.c
> > sound/soc/soc-utils.c
>
> Quite a few (I think all?) of these are quite old and and are the result
> of refactoring from pre-component code rather than modern drivers, it's
> likely there is no concrete reason for them to behave as they do.
I am a beginner in the kernel sound stack, alright then, the issue comes from
the drivers.
Thanks,
Regards
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-06 9:59 [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: add the driver component name to the component struc Kory Maincent
2021-12-06 19:33 ` Mark Brown
2021-12-07 8:47 ` Köry Maincent
2021-12-07 13:08 ` Mark Brown
2021-12-07 15:16 ` Köry Maincent [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211207161632.47ee0020@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390 \
--to=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).