From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CBDC433F5 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 17:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237500AbhLHRGB (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:06:01 -0500 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:56318 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237475AbhLHRF7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:05:59 -0500 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D745E1F953; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 17:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 17:02:26 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Jani Nikula , Junio C Hamano , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Konstantin Ryabitsev , Jonathan Corbet , git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Kees Cook Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] docs: add the new commit-msg tags 'Reported:' and 'Reviewed:' Message-ID: <20211208170226.GA12748@dcvr> References: <20211123185237.M476855@dcvr> <12cefa81-495b-3083-5f19-b319c704ebf7@leemhuis.info> <20211126171141.GA21826@dcvr> <42ff6b8d-0b7c-12e0-4648-a9232b0f577c@leemhuis.info> <20211127195231.GA4636@dcvr> <87mtlnjhj6.fsf@intel.com> <20211129172618.GA26651@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 30.11.21 09:24, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:29 PM Eric Wong wrote: > >> It's a bit much for common cases with git-send-email and > >> reasonable MUAs, I think. I don't know if formail is commonly > >> installed, nowadays... > > Well, after your earlier suggestion I considered to go with this: > > - perl -pi -e 's|^Message-Id:\s*]+)>?$|Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/$1|g;' "$1" > + perl -pi -e 's|^Message-ID:\s*]+)>?$|Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/$1|i;' "$1" > > But... > > > Of course ;-) You need it to run checkpatch on patch series obtained > > through "b4 am", before you apply them to your tree: > > > > $ cat *mbx | formail -s scripts/checkpatch.pl > > ...this made me wonder if formail would be the better solution. I came > up with this: > > formail -A "Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/`formail -c -x Message-ID < > "${1}" | sed 's!.*<\(.*\)>!\1!'`" < "${1}" | sponge "${1}" > > Downsides: instead of perl it requires sed and sponge (part of > moreutils, which I guess not everyone has installed; but I tried to > avoid a big here document or moving files around). As Geert noted, formail is probably reasonable, but I certainly don't have moreutils across all the systems I'm using right now. > Is that worth it? Or is there a way to realize this in a more elegant > fashion with tools everyone has installed? *shrug* Since newlines after ':' are a concern and it's (probably :P) safe to slurp entire contents of emails into memory nowadays; some minor tweaks to the original perl invocation should work: * use `$/ = undef' to force Perl to operate on the entire input at once * use `m' RE modifier to ensure `^' and `$' still match SOL/EOL ($/ is only the input record separator, it doesn't change Perl's definition of "lines" for `^' and `$') perl -i -p -e 'BEGIN{$/=undef};s|^Message-ID:\s*]+)>?$|Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/$1|im;'