linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
	Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Adjust the allowed NUMA imbalance when SD_NUMA spans multiple LLCs
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 10:49:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220105104918.GW3366@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220105104207.GV3366@techsingularity.net>

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 10:42:07AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 06:13:15PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > <SNIP>
> > >
> > > @@ -9050,9 +9054,9 @@ static bool update_pick_idlest(struct sched_group *idlest,
> > >   * This is an approximation as the number of running tasks may not be
> > >   * related to the number of busy CPUs due to sched_setaffinity.
> > >   */
> > > -static inline bool allow_numa_imbalance(int dst_running, int dst_weight)
> > > +static inline bool allow_numa_imbalance(int dst_running, int imb_numa_nr)
> > >  {
> > > -       return (dst_running < (dst_weight >> 2));
> > > +       return dst_running < imb_numa_nr;
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  /*
> > >
> > > <SNIP>
> > >
> > > @@ -9280,19 +9285,13 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
> > >         }
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -#define NUMA_IMBALANCE_MIN 2
> > > -
> > >  static inline long adjust_numa_imbalance(int imbalance,
> > > -                               int dst_running, int dst_weight)
> > > +                               int dst_running, int imb_numa_nr)
> > >  {
> > > -       if (!allow_numa_imbalance(dst_running, dst_weight))
> > > +       if (!allow_numa_imbalance(dst_running, imb_numa_nr))
> > >                 return imbalance;
> > >
> > > -       /*
> > > -        * Allow a small imbalance based on a simple pair of communicating
> > > -        * tasks that remain local when the destination is lightly loaded.
> > > -        */
> > > -       if (imbalance <= NUMA_IMBALANCE_MIN)
> > > +       if (imbalance <= imb_numa_nr)
> > 
> > Isn't this always true ?
> > 
> > imbalance is "always" < dst_running as imbalance is usually the number
> > of these tasks that we would like to migrate
> > 
> 
> It's not necessarily true. allow_numa_imbalanced is checking if
> dst_running < imb_numa_nr and adjust_numa_imbalance is checking the
> imbalance.
> 
> imb_numa_nr = 4
> dst_running = 2
> imbalance   = 1
> 
> In that case, imbalance of 1 is ok, but 2 is not.
> 

My bad, this is based on v5 which I just queued for testing.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-05 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-10  9:33 [PATCH v4 0/2] Adjust NUMA imbalance for multiple LLCs Mel Gorman
2021-12-10  9:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Use weight of SD_NUMA domain in find_busiest_group Mel Gorman
2021-12-21 10:53   ` Vincent Guittot
2021-12-21 11:32     ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-21 13:05       ` Vincent Guittot
2021-12-10  9:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Adjust the allowed NUMA imbalance when SD_NUMA spans multiple LLCs Mel Gorman
2021-12-13  8:28   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2021-12-13 13:01     ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-13 14:47       ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2021-12-15 11:52         ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2021-12-15 12:25           ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-16 18:33             ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2021-12-20 11:12               ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-21 15:03                 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2021-12-21 17:13                 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-12-22  8:52                   ` Jirka Hladky
2022-01-04 19:52                     ` Jirka Hladky
2022-01-05 10:42                   ` Mel Gorman
2022-01-05 10:49                     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2022-01-10 15:53                     ` Vincent Guittot
2022-01-12 10:24                       ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-17 19:54   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-02-08  9:43 [PATCH v6 0/2] Adjust NUMA imbalance for " Mel Gorman
2022-02-08  9:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Adjust the allowed NUMA imbalance when SD_NUMA spans " Mel Gorman
2022-02-08 16:19   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2022-02-09  5:10   ` K Prateek Nayak
2022-02-09 10:33     ` Mel Gorman
2022-02-11 19:02       ` Jirka Hladky
2022-02-14 10:27   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2022-02-14 11:03   ` Vincent Guittot
2022-02-03 14:46 [PATCH v5 0/2] Adjust NUMA imbalance for " Mel Gorman
2022-02-03 14:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Adjust the allowed NUMA imbalance when SD_NUMA spans " Mel Gorman
2022-02-04  7:06   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2022-02-04  9:04     ` Mel Gorman
2022-02-04 15:07   ` Nayak, KPrateek (K Prateek)
2022-02-04 16:45     ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-01 15:18 [PATCH v3 0/2] Adjust NUMA imbalance for " Mel Gorman
2021-12-01 15:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Adjust the allowed NUMA imbalance when SD_NUMA spans " Mel Gorman
2021-12-03  8:15   ` Barry Song
2021-12-03 10:50     ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-03 11:14       ` Barry Song
2021-12-03 13:27         ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-04 10:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-06  8:48     ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2021-12-06 14:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-06 15:12     ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-09 14:23       ` Valentin Schneider
2021-12-09 15:43         ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-25 15:19 [PATCH 0/2] Adjust NUMA imbalance for " Mel Gorman
2021-11-25 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Adjust the allowed NUMA imbalance when SD_NUMA spans " Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220105104918.GW3366@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=Valentin.Schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).