linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dongas86@gmail.com,
	jason.hui.liu@nxp.com, leoyang.li@nxp.com, abel.vesa@nxp.com,
	shawnguo@kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
	lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com, david@redhat.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, shijie.qin@nxp.com,
	Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: cma: try next MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES during retry
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 21:15:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220112131552.3329380-3-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220112131552.3329380-1-aisheng.dong@nxp.com>

On an ARMv7 platform with 32M pageblock(MAX_ORDER 14), we observed a
huge number of repeat retries of CMA allocation (1k+) during booting
when allocating one page for each of 3 mmc instance probe.

This is caused by CMA now supports cocurrent allocation since commit
a4efc174b382 ("mm/cma.c: remove redundant cma_mutex lock").
The pageblock or (MAX_ORDER -1) from which we are trying to allocate
memory may have already been acquired and isolated by others.
Current cma_alloc() will then retry the next area by the step of
bitmap_no + mask + 1 which are very likely within the same isolated range
and fail again. So when the pageblock or MAX_ORDER is big (e.g. 8192),
keep retrying in a small step become meaningless because it will be known
to fail at a huge number of times due to the pageblock has been isolated
by others, especially when allocating only one or two pages.

Instread of looping in the same pageblock and wasting CPU mips a lot,
especially for big pageblock system (e.g. 16M or 32M),
we try the next MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES directly.

Doing this way can greatly mitigate the situtation.

Below is the original error log during booting:
[    2.004804] cma: cma_alloc(cma (ptrval), count 1, align 0)
[    2.010318] cma: cma_alloc(cma (ptrval), count 1, align 0)
[    2.010776] cma: cma_alloc(): memory range at (ptrval) is busy, retrying
[    2.010785] cma: cma_alloc(): memory range at (ptrval) is busy, retrying
[    2.010793] cma: cma_alloc(): memory range at (ptrval) is busy, retrying
[    2.010800] cma: cma_alloc(): memory range at (ptrval) is busy, retrying
[    2.010807] cma: cma_alloc(): memory range at (ptrval) is busy, retrying
[    2.010814] cma: cma_alloc(): memory range at (ptrval) is busy, retrying
.... (+1K retries)

After fix, the 1200+ reties can be reduced to 0.
Another test running 8 VPU decoder in parallel shows that 1500+ retries
dropped to ~145.

IOW this patch can improve the CMA allocation speed a lot when there're
enough CMA memory by reducing retries significantly.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.11+
Fixes: a4efc174b382 ("mm/cma.c: remove redundant cma_mutex lock")
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
---
v1->v2:
 * change to align with MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES instead of pageblock_nr_pages
---
 mm/cma.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
index 1c13a729d274..1251f65e2364 100644
--- a/mm/cma.c
+++ b/mm/cma.c
@@ -500,7 +500,9 @@ struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, unsigned long count,
 		trace_cma_alloc_busy_retry(cma->name, pfn, pfn_to_page(pfn),
 					   count, align);
 		/* try again with a bit different memory target */
-		start = bitmap_no + mask + 1;
+		start = ALIGN(bitmap_no + mask + 1,
+			      MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES >> cma->order_per_bit);
+
 	}
 
 	trace_cma_alloc_finish(cma->name, pfn, page, count, align);
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-12 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-12 13:15 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: fix cma allocation fail sometimes Dong Aisheng
2022-01-12 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: cma: fix allocation may " Dong Aisheng
2022-01-12 13:15 ` Dong Aisheng [this message]
2022-01-25 16:33   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: cma: try next MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES during retry David Hildenbrand
2022-01-28 12:20     ` Dong Aisheng
2022-01-24 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: fix cma allocation fail sometimes Dong Aisheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220112131552.3329380-3-aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
    --to=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
    --cc=abel.vesa@nxp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dongas86@gmail.com \
    --cc=jason.hui.liu@nxp.com \
    --cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shijie.qin@nxp.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).