linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	tytso@mit.edu, Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] jbd2: No need to use t_handle_lock in jbd2_journal_wait_updates
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:27:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220113112749.d5tfszcksvxvshnn@quack3.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7e0f8c54306591a3a9c8fead1e0e54358052ab6.1642044249.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu 13-01-22 08:56:29, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Since jbd2_journal_wait_updates() uses waitq based on t_updates atomic_t
> variable. So from code review it looks like we don't need to use
> t_handle_lock spinlock for checking t_updates value.
> Hence this patch gets rid of the spinlock protection in
> jbd2_journal_wait_updates()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>

This patch looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

Actually looking at it, t_handle_lock seems to be very much unused. I agree
we don't need it when waiting for outstanding handles but the only
remaining uses are:

1) jbd2_journal_extend() where it is not needed either - we use
atomic_add_return() to manipulate t_outstanding_credits and hold
j_state_lock for reading which provides us enough exclusion.

2) update_t_max_wait() - this is the only valid use of t_handle_lock but we
can just switch it to cmpxchg loop with a bit of care. Something like:

	unsigned long old;

	ts = jbd2_time_diff(ts, transaction->t_start);
	old = transaction->t_max_wait;
	while (old < ts)
		old = cmpxchg(&transaction->t_max_wait, old, ts);

So perhaps you can add two more patches to remove other t_handle_lock uses
and drop it completely.

								Honza

> ---
>  include/linux/jbd2.h | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/jbd2.h b/include/linux/jbd2.h
> index 34b051aa9009..9bef47622b9d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/jbd2.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jbd2.h
> @@ -1768,22 +1768,18 @@ static inline void jbd2_journal_wait_updates(journal_t *journal)
>  	if (!commit_transaction)
>  		return;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&commit_transaction->t_handle_lock);
>  	while (atomic_read(&commit_transaction->t_updates)) {
>  		DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>  
>  		prepare_to_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait,
>  					TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>  		if (atomic_read(&commit_transaction->t_updates)) {
> -			spin_unlock(&commit_transaction->t_handle_lock);
>  			write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
>  			schedule();
>  			write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
> -			spin_lock(&commit_transaction->t_handle_lock);
>  		}
>  		finish_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait);
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock(&commit_transaction->t_handle_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-13  3:26 [PATCH 0/6] ext4/jbd2: inline_data fixes and some cleanups Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13  3:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] ext4: Fix error handling in ext4_restore_inline_data() Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 10:58   ` Jan Kara
2022-01-13  3:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] ext4: Remove redundant max inline_size check in ext4_da_write_inline_data_begin() Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 10:58   ` Jan Kara
2022-01-13  3:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] ext4: Fix error handling in ext4_fc_record_modified_inode() Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 11:00   ` Jan Kara
2022-01-13  3:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] jbd2: Cleanup unused functions declarations from jbd2.h Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 11:01   ` Jan Kara
2022-01-13  3:26 ` [PATCH 5/6] jbd2: Refactor wait logic for transaction updates into a common function Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 11:30   ` Jan Kara
2022-01-13 12:17     ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13  3:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] jbd2: No need to use t_handle_lock in jbd2_journal_wait_updates Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 11:27   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-01-13 12:38     ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-17 12:55       ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-17 14:38         ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220113112749.d5tfszcksvxvshnn@quack3.lan \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=enwlinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).