linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: fix a deadlock warning in kmem_cache_destroy
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 14:13:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117131304.pdc3mfdowkzovw6q@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39a3470f-06ab-cf41-32e4-80edb249c7d3@suse.cz>

Hi,

On 17/01/22 13:40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> +CC Clark
> 
> On 1/17/22 10:33, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2022-01-17 16:32:46 [+0800], Xin Long wrote:
> >> another issue. From the code analysis, this issue does exist on the
> >> upstream kernel, though I couldn't build an upstream RT kernel for the
> >> testing.
> > 
> > This should also reproduce in v5.16 since the commit in question is
> > there.
> 
> Yeah. I remember we had some issues with the commit during development, but
> I'd hope those were resolved and the commit that's ultimately merged got the
> fixes, see this subthread:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/0b36128c-3e12-77df-85fe-a153a714569b@quicinc.com/
> 
> >> > >         CPU0                        CPU1
> >> > >         ----                        ----
> >> > >   cpus_read_lock()
> >> > >                                    kn->active++
> >> > >                                    cpus_read_lock() [a]
> >> > >   wait until kn->active == 0
> >> > >
> >> > > Although cpu_hotplug_lock is a RWSEM, [a] will not block in there. But as
> >> > > lockdep annotations are added for cpu_hotplug_lock, a deadlock warning
> >> > > would be detected:
> > 
> > The cpu_hotplug_lock is a per-CPU RWSEM. The lock in [a] will block if
> > there is a writer pending.
> > 
> >> > >   ======================================================
> >> > >   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> >> > >   ------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >   dmsetup/1832 is trying to acquire lock:
> >> > >   ffff986f5a0f9f20 (kn->count#144){++++}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_remove+0x1d/0x30
> >> > >
> >> > >   but task is already holding lock:
> >> > >   ffffffffa43817c0 (slab_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kmem_cache_destroy+0x2a/0x120
> >> > >
> > 
> > I tried to create & destroy a cryptarget which creates/destroy a cache
> > via bio_put_slab(). Either the callchain is different or something else
> > is but I didn't see a lockdep warning.
> 
> RHEL-8 kernel seems to be 4.18, unless RT uses a newer one. Could be some
> silently relevant backport is missing? How about e.g. 59450bbc12be ("mm,
> slab, slub: stop taking cpu hotplug lock") ?

Hummm, looks like we have backported commit 59450bbc12be in RHEL-8.

Xin Long, would you be able to check if you still see the lockdep splat
with latest upstream RT?

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-5.16.y-rt

Thanks!
Juri


  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-17 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-14 14:23 [PATCH] mm: slub: fix a deadlock warning in kmem_cache_destroy Xin Long
2022-01-16  6:35 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-01-17  8:32   ` Xin Long
2022-01-17  9:33     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-17 12:40       ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-01-17 13:13         ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2022-01-18  8:00           ` Xin Long
2022-01-18 11:07             ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-01-19  8:38               ` Xin Long
2022-06-01 14:36 ` Maurizio Lombardi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220117131304.pdc3mfdowkzovw6q@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).