From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41942C433EF for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239767AbiAYKEh (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 05:04:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60176 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238491AbiAYJ7d (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 04:59:33 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x643.google.com (mail-pl1-x643.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::643]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B69EC06175B; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 01:59:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x643.google.com with SMTP id j16so8192691plx.4; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 01:59:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j/rRmDiMdmGlDszyCo/+/fHqa/st5+5A7HjoH3NKV08=; b=cYnSfuu7cXdFeqfoM+hegTyG4JSAyN1qSNbeBX1V1k3y0Jlvzele4X5rrqc9MTA70F DzRy3+qKF2rm3varwe20/g098zxwHdokrfUwZEX4Wxogx8HSQ4T7sRoJWww7gUgESoOQ h3G2sIxGvdfDG5pJChVK8Imr40QYdabRIDM+8C8aldKJP7YyycSxpVny2yrr5bsB0mUy 8M3P4MZOAJSiyn46N6gOGXSIHQYSWSAEvduVq3dYxskroY7W7zaqiKsMRGUr/A5komaF qGqADiMqXzL1IgljGbkw5dTH0oSZomXCmAXqtEA4ybI+rASYG3iW76UceqT8kMCWmTyM 4TSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j/rRmDiMdmGlDszyCo/+/fHqa/st5+5A7HjoH3NKV08=; b=sAr1hl1fkusq4RnkvB1m6yt/tg7M1OWu1JoFx6nUoMATRPH4sYFBY2HEZrFdtukdQB 25GIpJROHgb6dFNwl8tNyMp6bL64QmOBkLi7tYpR0Q6PS7A3NDPvSfYgHOa4ZhvHaNd4 sARXegfG2FEc0x4gvWYY9BEkeHli/u8mYLaAQlQMhjxKJOEVqcQsT20ih7/HNH8Kp/L7 6XSr77cM9qjHnANVEW1ZyhzlBJMJ/oYjewssThatKvjaBxwxGgISWJZz13xW9WOgCKxa S+CPib/GR5fGpcTF8uOIdOg4/cTQhzFIT9+hkQaRQknK76QXm3i8J5czXIdvCT2gSFh4 5M1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53255f5/VaJgIiFq5ArNl6rmfLBFBz/6kakMVo57EXRA+2Xyf5WD ++AtOE4QqzaRvyVpJPQigGI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLivPrqbSTiB4hpRIeQmhCIfmFOKjpzqLDUHj2ySIix16rb7GMsX2N9oGFO7SEmd9UopVAwg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:dac6:b0:14b:51c2:5d6d with SMTP id q6-20020a170902dac600b0014b51c25d6dmr8068078plx.3.1643104772108; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 01:59:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from CLOUDLIANG-MB0.tencent.com ([103.7.29.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id mq3sm201606pjb.4.2022.01.25.01.59.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 01:59:31 -0800 (PST) From: Jinrong Liang X-Google-Original-From: Jinrong Liang To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Xianting Tian , Jim Mattson , Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Joerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 06/19] KVM: x86/svm: Remove unused "vcpu" of svm_check_exit_valid() Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 17:58:56 +0800 Message-Id: <20220125095909.38122-7-cloudliang@tencent.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 (Apple Git-130) In-Reply-To: <20220125095909.38122-1-cloudliang@tencent.com> References: <20220125095909.38122-1-cloudliang@tencent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jinrong Liang The "struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu" parameter of svm_check_exit_valid() is not used, so remove it. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c index 6d31d357a83b..bc733dbadbdd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c @@ -3120,7 +3120,7 @@ static void dump_vmcb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) "excp_to:", save->last_excp_to); } -static bool svm_check_exit_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 exit_code) +static bool svm_check_exit_valid(u64 exit_code) { return (exit_code < ARRAY_SIZE(svm_exit_handlers) && svm_exit_handlers[exit_code]); @@ -3140,7 +3140,7 @@ static int svm_handle_invalid_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 exit_code) int svm_invoke_exit_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 exit_code) { - if (!svm_check_exit_valid(vcpu, exit_code)) + if (!svm_check_exit_valid(exit_code)) return svm_handle_invalid_exit(vcpu, exit_code); #ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE -- 2.33.1