linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com,
	serge@hallyn.com, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com,
	containers@lists.linux.dev, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com,
	roberto.sassu@huawei.com, mpeters@redhat.com, lhinds@redhat.com,
	lsturman@redhat.com, puiterwi@redhat.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
	jamjoom@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	paul@paul-moore.com, rgb@redhat.com,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 08/23] ima: Move measurement list related variables into ima_namespace
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:21:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220126092159.4rgclr5s3jli7aqy@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220125224645.79319-9-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 05:46:30PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Move measurement list related variables into the ima_namespace. This way
> a front-end like securityfs can show the measurement list inside an IMA
> namespace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> ---

>  security/integrity/ima/ima.h             |  5 +++--
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c          |  6 ++++--
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_init_ima_ns.c |  5 +++++
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c       | 12 ++++++-----
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c       | 27 +++++++++++-------------
>  5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> index 340a59174670..45706836a77b 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> @@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ struct ima_queue_entry {
>  	struct list_head later;		/* place in ima_measurements list */
>  	struct ima_template_entry *entry;
>  };
> -extern struct list_head ima_measurements;	/* list of all measurements */
>  
>  /* Some details preceding the binary serialized measurement list */
>  struct ima_kexec_hdr {
> @@ -136,6 +135,8 @@ struct ima_namespace {
>  	struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry;
>  
>  	struct ima_h_table ima_htable;
> +	struct list_head ima_measurements;	/* list of all measurements */
> +	unsigned long binary_runtime_size;	/* used by init_ima_ns */
>  } __randomize_layout;

Moving this into struct imans seems sane to me but I'm not going to ack
it because I don't have enough knowledge to guarantee that this code
will only run for init_ima_ns. I'll leave that to Mimi.

>  extern struct ima_namespace init_ima_ns;
>  
> @@ -186,7 +187,7 @@ int ima_restore_measurement_entry(struct ima_namespace *ns,
>  int ima_restore_measurement_list(struct ima_namespace *ns,
>  				 loff_t bufsize, void *buf);
>  int ima_measurements_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v);
> -unsigned long ima_get_binary_runtime_size(void);
> +unsigned long ima_get_binary_runtime_size(struct ima_namespace *ns);
>  int ima_init_template(void);
>  void ima_init_template_list(void);
>  int __init ima_init_digests(void);
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
> index 9b4dce57c1a6..b2f088dd8572 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
> @@ -80,12 +80,13 @@ static const struct file_operations ima_measurements_count_ops = {
>  /* returns pointer to hlist_node */
>  static void *ima_measurements_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>  {
> +	struct ima_namespace *ns = &init_ima_ns;
>  	loff_t l = *pos;
>  	struct ima_queue_entry *qe;
>  
>  	/* we need a lock since pos could point beyond last element */
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -	list_for_each_entry_rcu(qe, &ima_measurements, later) {
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(qe, &ns->ima_measurements, later) {
>  		if (!l--) {
>  			rcu_read_unlock();
>  			return qe;
> @@ -97,6 +98,7 @@ static void *ima_measurements_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>  
>  static void *ima_measurements_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
>  {
> +	struct ima_namespace *ns = &init_ima_ns;
>  	struct ima_queue_entry *qe = v;
>  
>  	/* lock protects when reading beyond last element
> @@ -107,7 +109,7 @@ static void *ima_measurements_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  	(*pos)++;
>  
> -	return (&qe->later == &ima_measurements) ? NULL : qe;
> +	return (&qe->later == &ns->ima_measurements) ? NULL : qe;
>  }
>  
>  static void ima_measurements_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init_ima_ns.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init_ima_ns.c
> index 1945fa8cfc4d..a7477072c587 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init_ima_ns.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init_ima_ns.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ static int ima_init_namespace(struct ima_namespace *ns)
>  	atomic_long_set(&ns->ima_htable.len, 0);
>  	atomic_long_set(&ns->ima_htable.violations, 0);
>  	memset(&ns->ima_htable.queue, 0, sizeof(ns->ima_htable.queue));
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ns->ima_measurements);
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC) && ns == &init_ima_ns)
> +		ns->binary_runtime_size = 0;
> +	else
> +		ns->binary_runtime_size = ULONG_MAX;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> index f3ef8a0df992..e83b18492f46 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
>  #include "ima.h"
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
> -static int ima_dump_measurement_list(unsigned long *buffer_size, void **buffer,
> +static int ima_dump_measurement_list(struct ima_namespace *ns,
> +				     unsigned long *buffer_size, void **buffer,
>  				     unsigned long segment_size)
>  {
>  	struct ima_queue_entry *qe;
> @@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ static int ima_dump_measurement_list(unsigned long *buffer_size, void **buffer,
>  
>  	memset(&khdr, 0, sizeof(khdr));
>  	khdr.version = 1;
> -	list_for_each_entry_rcu(qe, &ima_measurements, later) {
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(qe, &ns->ima_measurements, later) {
>  		if (file.count < file.size) {
>  			khdr.count++;
>  			ima_measurements_show(&file, qe);
> @@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
>  	struct kexec_buf kbuf = { .image = image, .buf_align = PAGE_SIZE,
>  				  .buf_min = 0, .buf_max = ULONG_MAX,
>  				  .top_down = true };
> +	struct ima_namespace *ns = &init_ima_ns;
>  	unsigned long binary_runtime_size;
>  
>  	/* use more understandable variable names than defined in kbuf */
> @@ -96,11 +98,11 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
>  	 * Reserve an extra half page of memory for additional measurements
>  	 * added during the kexec load.
>  	 */
> -	binary_runtime_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size();
> +	binary_runtime_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size(ns);
>  	if (binary_runtime_size >= ULONG_MAX - PAGE_SIZE)
>  		kexec_segment_size = ULONG_MAX;
>  	else
> -		kexec_segment_size = ALIGN(ima_get_binary_runtime_size() +
> +		kexec_segment_size = ALIGN(ima_get_binary_runtime_size(ns) +
>  					   PAGE_SIZE / 2, PAGE_SIZE);
>  	if ((kexec_segment_size == ULONG_MAX) ||
>  	    ((kexec_segment_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) > totalram_pages() / 2)) {
> @@ -108,7 +110,7 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	ima_dump_measurement_list(&kexec_buffer_size, &kexec_buffer,
> +	ima_dump_measurement_list(ns, &kexec_buffer_size, &kexec_buffer,
>  				  kexec_segment_size);
>  	if (!kexec_buffer) {
>  		pr_err("Not enough memory for the kexec measurement buffer.\n");
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
> index 43961d5cd2ef..0355c2b0932c 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
> @@ -24,13 +24,6 @@
>  /* pre-allocated array of tpm_digest structures to extend a PCR */
>  static struct tpm_digest *digests;
>  
> -LIST_HEAD(ima_measurements);	/* list of all measurements */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
> -static unsigned long binary_runtime_size;
> -#else
> -static unsigned long binary_runtime_size = ULONG_MAX;
> -#endif
> -
>  /* mutex protects atomicity of extending measurement list
>   * and extending the TPM PCR aggregate. Since tpm_extend can take
>   * long (and the tpm driver uses a mutex), we can't use the spinlock.
> @@ -100,7 +93,7 @@ static int ima_add_digest_entry(struct ima_namespace *ns,
>  	qe->entry = entry;
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qe->later);
> -	list_add_tail_rcu(&qe->later, &ima_measurements);
> +	list_add_tail_rcu(&qe->later, &ns->ima_measurements);
>  
>  	atomic_long_inc(&ns->ima_htable.len);
>  	if (update_htable) {
> @@ -110,12 +103,14 @@ static int ima_add_digest_entry(struct ima_namespace *ns,
>  		INIT_HLIST_NODE(&qe->hnext);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (binary_runtime_size != ULONG_MAX) {
> +	if (ns->binary_runtime_size != ULONG_MAX) {
>  		int size;
>  
>  		size = get_binary_runtime_size(entry);
> -		binary_runtime_size = (binary_runtime_size < ULONG_MAX - size) ?
> -		     binary_runtime_size + size : ULONG_MAX;
> +		ns->binary_runtime_size =
> +			(ns->binary_runtime_size < ULONG_MAX - size)
> +			? ns->binary_runtime_size + size
> +			: ULONG_MAX;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -123,14 +118,16 @@ static int ima_add_digest_entry(struct ima_namespace *ns,
>  /*
>   * Return the amount of memory required for serializing the
>   * entire binary_runtime_measurement list, including the ima_kexec_hdr
> - * structure.
> + * structure. Carrying the measurement list across kexec is limited
> + * to init_ima_ns.
>   */
> -unsigned long ima_get_binary_runtime_size(void)
> +unsigned long ima_get_binary_runtime_size(struct ima_namespace *ns)
>  {
> -	if (binary_runtime_size >= (ULONG_MAX - sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr)))
> +	if (ns->binary_runtime_size >=
> +				(ULONG_MAX - sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr)))
>  		return ULONG_MAX;
>  	else
> -		return binary_runtime_size + sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr);
> +		return ns->binary_runtime_size + sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr);
>  }
>  
>  static int ima_pcr_extend(struct tpm_digest *digests_arg, int pcr)
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-26  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-25 22:46 [PATCH v9 00/23] ima: Namespace IMA with audit support in IMA-ns Stefan Berger
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 01/23] ima: Remove ima_policy file before directory Stefan Berger
2022-01-26  8:30   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 02/23] ima: Do not print policy rule with inactive LSM labels Stefan Berger
2022-01-26  8:38   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-27 14:12     ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 03/23] securityfs: rework dentry creation Stefan Berger
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 04/23] securityfs: Extend securityfs with namespacing support Stefan Berger
2022-01-27 16:53   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-31 22:28     ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-31 23:43       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 05/23] ima: Define ima_namespace struct and start moving variables into it Stefan Berger
2022-01-26  8:47   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 06/23] ima: Move arch_policy_entry into ima_namespace Stefan Berger
2022-01-26  9:11   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-27 19:42     ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 07/23] ima: Move ima_htable " Stefan Berger
2022-01-26  9:16   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 08/23] ima: Move measurement list related variables " Stefan Berger
2022-01-26  9:21   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2022-01-26 22:23     ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-27 21:48       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-28 14:06         ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 09/23] ima: Move some IMA policy and filesystem " Stefan Berger
2022-01-26  9:23   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-27 22:30   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-28 15:44     ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-28 16:03       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 10/23] ima: Move IMA securityfs files into ima_namespace or onto stack Stefan Berger
2022-01-26  9:40   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-27 17:02     ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-28  3:13       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 11/23] ima: Move ima_lsm_policy_notifier into ima_namespace Stefan Berger
2022-01-26 13:05   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-26 21:54     ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 12/23] ima: Define mac_admin_ns_capable() as a wrapper for ns_capable() Stefan Berger
2022-01-26 13:43   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 13/23] ima: Only accept AUDIT rules for non-init_ima_ns namespaces for now Stefan Berger
2022-01-26 13:44   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 14/23] userns: Add pointer to ima_namespace to user_namespace Stefan Berger
2022-01-26 14:46   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 15/23] ima: Implement hierarchical processing of file accesses Stefan Berger
2022-01-26 12:39   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-26 22:05     ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 16/23] ima: Implement ima_free_policy_rules() for freeing of an ima_namespace Stefan Berger
2022-01-28 14:02   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-31 18:56     ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 17/23] ima: Add functions for creating and " Stefan Berger
2022-01-26 13:56   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 18/23] integrity/ima: Define ns_status for storing namespaced iint data Stefan Berger
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 19/23] ima: Namespace audit status flags Stefan Berger
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 20/23] ima: Setup securityfs for IMA namespace Stefan Berger
2022-01-26 14:03   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 21/23] ima: Introduce securityfs file to activate an " Stefan Berger
2022-01-26 14:31   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-27 15:24     ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 22/23] ima: Show owning user namespace's uid and gid when displaying policy Stefan Berger
2022-01-26 14:43   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-26 14:43     ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-26 23:13     ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-25 22:46 ` [PATCH v9 23/23] ima: Enable IMA namespaces Stefan Berger
2022-01-26 14:57   ` Christian Brauner
2022-01-26 13:19 ` [PATCH v9 00/23] ima: Namespace IMA with audit support in IMA-ns Christian Brauner
2022-01-28 18:34   ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-26 16:52 ` Stefan Berger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220126092159.4rgclr5s3jli7aqy@wittgenstein \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jamjoom@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com \
    --cc=lhinds@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lsturman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpeters@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=puiterwi@redhat.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).