From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A91C433EF for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231627AbiAZVAk (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:00:40 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]:39230 "EHLO ams.source.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229726AbiAZVAj (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:00:39 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CF53B82018; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E277FC340E3; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:00:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:00:34 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Beau Belgrave Cc: Kees Cook , Masami Hiramatsu , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kspp tree Message-ID: <20220126160034.27815079@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20220126194138.GA4298@kbox> References: <20220125233154.dac280ed36944c0c2fe6f3ac@kernel.org> <202201251256.CCCBE9851E@keescook> <20220125162326.3d1ca960@gandalf.local.home> <20220125162859.2b3cc8a0@gandalf.local.home> <202201251402.0FB08DB@keescook> <20220125172114.6807ed8f@gandalf.local.home> <20220126093538.893fb44a7cb0a7cd840c7fdb@kernel.org> <20220125201634.698cc777@gandalf.local.home> <202201251917.18361B4F6@keescook> <20220125222545.353fa400@gandalf.local.home> <20220126194138.GA4298@kbox> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:41:38 -0800 Beau Belgrave wrote: > Right, and on the user side we will not know the start of the "data" / > fixed offset without carrying back that information somehow, due to the > common header size not being a fixed length forever. Good point! The data is not exported to user space via the format files like the __ref_loc field is, so there's no guarantee of knowing where data is. Let's leave it as is. -- Steve