[PATCH v2 0/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Reorganize mux configuration

[PATCH v2 0/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Reorganize mux configuration

[Prashant Malani]

This is a short series that reorganizes when mux configuration occurs
during Type C port updates. The first 2 patches are minor refactors
which move some of the mux update logic to within
cros_typec_configure_mux(). The third patch moves
cros_typec_configure_mux() itself to be earlier in
cros_typec_port_update().

The final patch updates the stashed mux flag when a partner removal has
occured.

v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/20220207214026.1526151-1-pmalani@chromium.org/

Changes in v2:
- Addressed minor comments (unrelated variable initialization. variable
  name change, return value can be 0).

Prashant Malani (4):
  platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Move mux flag checks
  platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Get mux state inside configure_mux
  platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Configure muxes at start of port
    update
  platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Update mux flags during partner
    removal

 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 76 +++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

-- 
2.35.0.263.gb82422642f-goog

[PATCH v2 1/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Move mux flag checks

[Prashant Malani]

Move mux and role flag checks inside of cros_typec_configure_mux(),
which is a more logical location for them.

Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
---

Changes in v2:
- Removed unrelated "ret" variable initialization.

 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
index c6f17e3ef72d..58d08dd02f65 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
@@ -521,6 +521,13 @@ static int cros_typec_configure_mux(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num,
 	enum typec_orientation orientation;
 	int ret;
 
+	/* No change needs to be made, let's exit early. */
+	if (port->mux_flags == mux_flags && port->role == pd_ctrl->role)
+		return 0;
+
+	port->mux_flags = mux_flags;
+	port->role = pd_ctrl->role;
+
 	if (mux_flags == USB_PD_MUX_NONE) {
 		ret = cros_typec_usb_disconnect_state(port);
 		goto mux_ack;
@@ -983,13 +990,6 @@ static int cros_typec_port_update(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	/* No change needs to be made, let's exit early. */
-	if (typec->ports[port_num]->mux_flags == mux_resp.flags &&
-	    typec->ports[port_num]->role == resp.role)
-		return 0;
-
-	typec->ports[port_num]->mux_flags = mux_resp.flags;
-	typec->ports[port_num]->role = resp.role;
 	ret = cros_typec_configure_mux(typec, port_num, mux_resp.flags, &resp);
 	if (ret)
 		dev_warn(typec->dev, "Configure muxes failed, err = %d\n", ret);
-- 
2.35.0.263.gb82422642f-goog

[PATCH v2 2/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Get mux state inside configure_mux

[Prashant Malani]

Move the function which gets current mux state inside the
cros_typec_configure_mux() function. It is better to group those
bits of functionality together, and it makes it easier to move around
cros_typec_configure_mux() later.

While we are doing this, also inline the cros_typec_get_mux_info() inside
of cros_typec_configure_mux().

Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
---

Changes in v2:
- Changed "mux_resp" variable to "resp".

 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 55 +++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
index 58d08dd02f65..3d34ece7f790 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
@@ -513,27 +513,38 @@ static int cros_typec_enable_usb4(struct cros_typec_data *typec,
 }
 
 static int cros_typec_configure_mux(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num,
-				uint8_t mux_flags,
 				struct ec_response_usb_pd_control_v2 *pd_ctrl)
 {
 	struct cros_typec_port *port = typec->ports[port_num];
+	struct ec_response_usb_pd_mux_info resp;
+	struct ec_params_usb_pd_mux_info req = {
+		.port = port_num,
+	};
 	struct ec_params_usb_pd_mux_ack mux_ack;
 	enum typec_orientation orientation;
 	int ret;
 
+	ret = cros_ec_command(typec->ec, 0, EC_CMD_USB_PD_MUX_INFO,
+			      &req, sizeof(req), &resp, sizeof(resp));
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_warn(typec->dev, "Failed to get mux info for port: %d, err = %d\n",
+			 port_num, ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	/* No change needs to be made, let's exit early. */
-	if (port->mux_flags == mux_flags && port->role == pd_ctrl->role)
+	if (port->mux_flags == resp.flags && port->role == pd_ctrl->role)
 		return 0;
 
-	port->mux_flags = mux_flags;
+	port->mux_flags = resp.flags;
 	port->role = pd_ctrl->role;
 
-	if (mux_flags == USB_PD_MUX_NONE) {
+	if (port->mux_flags == USB_PD_MUX_NONE) {
 		ret = cros_typec_usb_disconnect_state(port);
 		goto mux_ack;
 	}
 
-	if (mux_flags & USB_PD_MUX_POLARITY_INVERTED)
+	if (port->mux_flags & USB_PD_MUX_POLARITY_INVERTED)
 		orientation = TYPEC_ORIENTATION_REVERSE;
 	else
 		orientation = TYPEC_ORIENTATION_NORMAL;
@@ -548,22 +559,22 @@ static int cros_typec_configure_mux(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	if (mux_flags & USB_PD_MUX_USB4_ENABLED) {
+	if (port->mux_flags & USB_PD_MUX_USB4_ENABLED) {
 		ret = cros_typec_enable_usb4(typec, port_num, pd_ctrl);
-	} else if (mux_flags & USB_PD_MUX_TBT_COMPAT_ENABLED) {
+	} else if (port->mux_flags & USB_PD_MUX_TBT_COMPAT_ENABLED) {
 		ret = cros_typec_enable_tbt(typec, port_num, pd_ctrl);
-	} else if (mux_flags & USB_PD_MUX_DP_ENABLED) {
+	} else if (port->mux_flags & USB_PD_MUX_DP_ENABLED) {
 		ret = cros_typec_enable_dp(typec, port_num, pd_ctrl);
-	} else if (mux_flags & USB_PD_MUX_SAFE_MODE) {
+	} else if (port->mux_flags & USB_PD_MUX_SAFE_MODE) {
 		ret = cros_typec_usb_safe_state(port);
-	} else if (mux_flags & USB_PD_MUX_USB_ENABLED) {
+	} else if (port->mux_flags & USB_PD_MUX_USB_ENABLED) {
 		port->state.alt = NULL;
 		port->state.mode = TYPEC_STATE_USB;
 		ret = typec_mux_set(port->mux, &port->state);
 	} else {
 		dev_dbg(typec->dev,
 			"Unrecognized mode requested, mux flags: %x\n",
-			mux_flags);
+			port->mux_flags);
 	}
 
 mux_ack:
@@ -638,17 +649,6 @@ static void cros_typec_set_port_params_v1(struct cros_typec_data *typec,
 	}
 }
 
-static int cros_typec_get_mux_info(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num,
-				   struct ec_response_usb_pd_mux_info *resp)
-{
-	struct ec_params_usb_pd_mux_info req = {
-		.port = port_num,
-	};
-
-	return cros_ec_command(typec->ec, 0, EC_CMD_USB_PD_MUX_INFO, &req,
-			       sizeof(req), resp, sizeof(*resp));
-}
-
 /*
  * Helper function to register partner/plug altmodes.
  */
@@ -946,7 +946,6 @@ static int cros_typec_port_update(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num)
 {
 	struct ec_params_usb_pd_control req;
 	struct ec_response_usb_pd_control_v2 resp;
-	struct ec_response_usb_pd_mux_info mux_resp;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (port_num < 0 || port_num >= typec->num_ports) {
@@ -982,15 +981,7 @@ static int cros_typec_port_update(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num)
 		cros_typec_handle_status(typec, port_num);
 
 	/* Update the switches if they exist, according to requested state */
-	ret = cros_typec_get_mux_info(typec, port_num, &mux_resp);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_warn(typec->dev,
-			 "Failed to get mux info for port: %d, err = %d\n",
-			 port_num, ret);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	ret = cros_typec_configure_mux(typec, port_num, mux_resp.flags, &resp);
+	ret = cros_typec_configure_mux(typec, port_num, &resp);
 	if (ret)
 		dev_warn(typec->dev, "Configure muxes failed, err = %d\n", ret);
 
-- 
2.35.0.263.gb82422642f-goog

[PATCH v2 3/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Configure muxes at start of port update

[Prashant Malani]

There are situations where the mux state reported by the Embedded
Controller (EC), might lag the partner "connected" state. So, the mux
state might still suggest that a partner is connected, while the PD
"connected" state, being in Try.SNK (for example) suggests that the
partner is disconnected.

In such a scenario, we will end up sending a disconnect command to the
mux driver, followed by a connect command, since the mux is configured
later. Avoid this by configuring the mux before
registering/disconnecting a partner.

Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
---

Changes in v2:
- Change return at end of port_update() to just return 0.

 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
index 3d34ece7f790..3019e29f200d 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
@@ -965,6 +965,11 @@ static int cros_typec_port_update(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
+	/* Update the switches if they exist, according to requested state */
+	ret = cros_typec_configure_mux(typec, port_num, &resp);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_warn(typec->dev, "Configure muxes failed, err = %d\n", ret);
+
 	dev_dbg(typec->dev, "Enabled %d: 0x%hhx\n", port_num, resp.enabled);
 	dev_dbg(typec->dev, "Role %d: 0x%hhx\n", port_num, resp.role);
 	dev_dbg(typec->dev, "Polarity %d: 0x%hhx\n", port_num, resp.polarity);
@@ -980,12 +985,7 @@ static int cros_typec_port_update(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num)
 	if (typec->typec_cmd_supported)
 		cros_typec_handle_status(typec, port_num);
 
-	/* Update the switches if they exist, according to requested state */
-	ret = cros_typec_configure_mux(typec, port_num, &resp);
-	if (ret)
-		dev_warn(typec->dev, "Configure muxes failed, err = %d\n", ret);
-
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int cros_typec_get_cmd_version(struct cros_typec_data *typec)
-- 
2.35.0.263.gb82422642f-goog

[PATCH v2 4/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Update mux flags during partner removal

[Prashant Malani]

In cros_typec_remove_partner(), we call
cros_typec_usb_disconnect_state() which sets the switches/muxes to be in
a disconnected state. This also happens in cros_typec_configure_mux().
However, unlike there, here the mux_flags variable hasn't been updated
to reflect that a disconnection has occurred. Update the flag here
accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
---

Changes in v2:
- No changes.

 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
index 3019e29f200d..4bd2752c0823 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static void cros_typec_remove_partner(struct cros_typec_data *typec,
 	cros_typec_unregister_altmodes(typec, port_num, true);
 
 	cros_typec_usb_disconnect_state(port);
+	port->mux_flags = USB_PD_MUX_NONE;
 
 	typec_unregister_partner(port->partner);
 	port->partner = NULL;
-- 
2.35.0.263.gb82422642f-goog

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Move mux flag checks

[Tzung-Bi Shih]

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:47:18PM +0000, Prashant Malani wrote:
> Move mux and role flag checks inside of cros_typec_configure_mux(),
> which is a more logical location for them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>

Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Get mux state inside configure_mux

[Tzung-Bi Shih]

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:47:20PM +0000, Prashant Malani wrote:
> Move the function which gets current mux state inside the
> cros_typec_configure_mux() function. It is better to group those
> bits of functionality together, and it makes it easier to move around
> cros_typec_configure_mux() later.
> 
> While we are doing this, also inline the cros_typec_get_mux_info() inside
> of cros_typec_configure_mux().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>

Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Update mux flags during partner removal

[Tzung-Bi Shih]

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:47:24PM +0000, Prashant Malani wrote:
> In cros_typec_remove_partner(), we call
> cros_typec_usb_disconnect_state() which sets the switches/muxes to be in
> a disconnected state. This also happens in cros_typec_configure_mux().
> However, unlike there, here the mux_flags variable hasn't been updated
> to reflect that a disconnection has occurred. Update the flag here
> accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>

Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Configure muxes at start of port update

[Benson Leung]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2512 bytes --]

Hi Prashant,

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:47:22PM +0000, Prashant Malani wrote:
> There are situations where the mux state reported by the Embedded
> Controller (EC), might lag the partner "connected" state. So, the mux
> state might still suggest that a partner is connected, while the PD
> "connected" state, being in Try.SNK (for example) suggests that the
> partner is disconnected.
> 
> In such a scenario, we will end up sending a disconnect command to the
> mux driver, followed by a connect command, since the mux is configured
> later. Avoid this by configuring the mux before
> registering/disconnecting a partner.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>

Reviewed-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>


> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Change return at end of port_update() to just return 0.
> 
>  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> index 3d34ece7f790..3019e29f200d 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> @@ -965,6 +965,11 @@ static int cros_typec_port_update(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num)
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	/* Update the switches if they exist, according to requested state */
> +	ret = cros_typec_configure_mux(typec, port_num, &resp);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_warn(typec->dev, "Configure muxes failed, err = %d\n", ret);
> +
>  	dev_dbg(typec->dev, "Enabled %d: 0x%hhx\n", port_num, resp.enabled);
>  	dev_dbg(typec->dev, "Role %d: 0x%hhx\n", port_num, resp.role);
>  	dev_dbg(typec->dev, "Polarity %d: 0x%hhx\n", port_num, resp.polarity);
> @@ -980,12 +985,7 @@ static int cros_typec_port_update(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num)
>  	if (typec->typec_cmd_supported)
>  		cros_typec_handle_status(typec, port_num);
>  
> -	/* Update the switches if they exist, according to requested state */
> -	ret = cros_typec_configure_mux(typec, port_num, &resp);
> -	if (ret)
> -		dev_warn(typec->dev, "Configure muxes failed, err = %d\n", ret);
> -
> -	return ret;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int cros_typec_get_cmd_version(struct cros_typec_data *typec)
> -- 
> 2.35.0.263.gb82422642f-goog
> 
> 

-- 
Benson Leung
Staff Software Engineer
Chrome OS Kernel
Google Inc.
bleung@google.com
Chromium OS Project
bleung@chromium.org

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Reorganize mux configuration

[patchwork-bot+chrome-platform]

Hello:

This series was applied to chrome-platform/linux.git (for-kernelci)
by Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>:

On Tue,  8 Feb 2022 18:47:16 +0000 you wrote:
> This is a short series that reorganizes when mux configuration occurs
> during Type C port updates. The first 2 patches are minor refactors
> which move some of the mux update logic to within
> cros_typec_configure_mux(). The third patch moves
> cros_typec_configure_mux() itself to be earlier in
> cros_typec_port_update().
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,1/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Move mux flag checks
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/53a0023c6450
  - [v2,2/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Get mux state inside configure_mux
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/0d8495dc0321
  - [v2,3/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Configure muxes at start of port update
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/af34f115b3b7
  - [v2,4/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Update mux flags during partner removal
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/b579f139e470

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Reorganize mux configuration

[patchwork-bot+chrome-platform]

Hello:

This series was applied to chrome-platform/linux.git (for-next)
by Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>:

On Tue,  8 Feb 2022 18:47:16 +0000 you wrote:
> This is a short series that reorganizes when mux configuration occurs
> during Type C port updates. The first 2 patches are minor refactors
> which move some of the mux update logic to within
> cros_typec_configure_mux(). The third patch moves
> cros_typec_configure_mux() itself to be earlier in
> cros_typec_port_update().
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,1/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Move mux flag checks
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/53a0023c6450
  - [v2,2/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Get mux state inside configure_mux
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/0d8495dc0321
  - [v2,3/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Configure muxes at start of port update
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/af34f115b3b7
  - [v2,4/4] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Update mux flags during partner removal
    https://git.kernel.org/chrome-platform/c/b579f139e470

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html