linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Radoslaw Burny <rburny@google.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] btrfs: change lockdep class size check using ks->names
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:03:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220208190301.GF12643@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220208184208.79303-7-namhyung@kernel.org>

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 10:42:02AM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> With upcoming lock tracepoints config, it'd allow some lockdep
> annotation code without enabling CONFIG_LOCKDEP actually.  In that
> config, size of the struct lock_class_key would be 0.
> 
> But it'd cause divide-by-zero in btrfs_set_buffer_lockdep_class() due
> to ARRAY_SIZE macro.  Let's change it to use ks->names[] instead.  It
> should have the same size as with ks->keys[].
> 
> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-08 18:41 [RFC 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1) Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/12] locking: Pass correct outer wait type info Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/12] cgroup: rstat: Make cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock name readable Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:46   ` Tejun Heo
2022-02-08 19:16     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 23:51       ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/12] timer: Protect lockdep functions with #ifdef Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:36   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-08 20:29     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 21:19       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 04/12] workqueue: " Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:48   ` Tejun Heo
2022-02-08 19:17     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:38   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915: " Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:51   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-08 19:22     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 13:49       ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-09 16:27         ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-09 19:28           ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 06/12] btrfs: change lockdep class size check using ks->names Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:03   ` David Sterba [this message]
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 07/12] locking: Introduce CONFIG_LOCK_INFO Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 08/12] locking/mutex: Init name properly w/ CONFIG_LOCK_INFO Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 09/12] locking: Add more static lockdep init macros Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 10/12] locking: Add CONFIG_LOCK_TRACEPOINTS option Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 11/12] locking/mutex: Revive fast functions for CONFIG_LOCK_TRACEPOINTS Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09  8:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-09 20:15     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 12/12] locking: Move lock_acquired() from the fast path Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:14 ` [RFC 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1) Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09  9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-09 18:19   ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 18:29     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:02       ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 19:17         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:37           ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 19:22         ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 19:28           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:45             ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 19:56               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 20:17               ` Waiman Long
2022-02-10  0:27                 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-10  2:12                   ` Waiman Long
2022-02-10  9:33                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-10  0:32   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-10  9:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-10 19:14       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-10 19:27         ` Waiman Long
2022-02-10 20:10           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-11  5:57             ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-11  5:55       ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-11 10:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-08 19:43 [RFC RESEND 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1.1) Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:43 ` [PATCH 06/12] btrfs: change lockdep class size check using ks->names Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220208190301.GF12643@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rburny@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).