linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>,
	mcgrof@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, pmladek@suse.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeyu@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, ghalat@redhat.com,
	allen.lkml@gmail.com, void@manifault.com, joe@perches.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 07/13] module: Move extra signature support out of core code
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:37:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220209143756.53gw3ve46gaseqny@ava.usersys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2202091526260.32090@pobox.suse.cz>

On Wed 2022-02-09 15:28 +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> Please, drop these extern modifiers in front of function declarations. 
> They are unnecessary. It applies to different patches of the set as well.

Agreed - this was suggested previously.
The next iteration should be published soon. Just waiting on 0-day.

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
> > +extern int module_sig_check(struct load_info *info, int flags);
> > +#else /* !CONFIG_MODULE_SIG */
> > +static int module_sig_check(struct load_info *info, int flags)
> > +{
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> I think it should be 
> static inline int module_sig_check(struct load_info *info, int flags)

Yes, indeed it should. Thanks for the feedback.


Kind regards,

-- 
Aaron Tomlin

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-09 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-30 21:32 [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up Aaron Tomlin
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/13] module: Move all into module/ Aaron Tomlin
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/13] module: Simple refactor in preparation for split Aaron Tomlin
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-08 11:42   ` Petr Mladek
2022-02-08 15:18     ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/13] module: Move latched RB-tree " Aaron Tomlin
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/13] module: Move arch strict rwx " Aaron Tomlin
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/13] module: Move " Aaron Tomlin
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/13] module: Move extra signature support out of core code Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-09 14:28   ` Miroslav Benes
2022-02-09 14:37     ` Aaron Tomlin [this message]
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/13] module: Move kmemleak support to a separate file Aaron Tomlin
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/13] module: Move kallsyms support into " Aaron Tomlin
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/13] module: Move procfs " Aaron Tomlin
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/13] module: Move sysfs " Aaron Tomlin
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/13] module: Move kdb_modules list out of core code Aaron Tomlin
2022-01-30 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/13] module: Move version support into a separate file Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-01 16:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up Allen
2022-02-05 20:33   ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-02  2:44 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-02-06 14:40   ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-03  0:20 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-02-03  7:48   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-06 14:45     ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-03 18:01   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-06 16:54     ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-07 16:46     ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-07 17:17       ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-07 18:01         ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-08  7:50           ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-08 10:05             ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-03 18:15   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-06 16:57     ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-03 19:43   ` Michal Suchánek
2022-02-03 20:13     ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-02-03 20:10   ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-02-06 17:00     ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-06 14:42   ` Aaron Tomlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220209143756.53gw3ve46gaseqny@ava.usersys.com \
    --to=atomlin@atomlin.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=allen.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=ghalat@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).