linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Alexey Gladkov" <legion@kernel.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Solar Designer" <solar@openwall.com>,
	"Ran Xiaokai" <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] ucounts: Use the same code to enforce RLIMIT_NPROC in fork and exec
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 20:13:24 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220211021324.4116773-8-ebiederm@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o83e2mbu.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>

Historically these pieces of code have slightly diverged and caused
problems.  To avoid that in the future create a common function to see
if RLIMIT_NPROC is over a limit and the limit should be enforced.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
 fs/exec.c                    |  7 ++-----
 include/linux/sched/signal.h |  2 ++
 kernel/fork.c                | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 01c8c7bae9b4..8913dbb9a479 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1875,14 +1875,11 @@ static int do_execveat_common(int fd, struct filename *filename,
 		return PTR_ERR(filename);
 
 	/*
-	 * After calling set*uid() is RLIMT_NPROC exceeded?
+	 * After calling set*uid() is RLIMIT_NPROC exceeded?
 	 * This can not be checked in set*uid() because too many programs don't
 	 * check the setuid() return code.
 	 */
-	if ((current->flags & PF_NPROC_CHECK) &&
-	    is_ucounts_overlimit(current_ucounts(), UCOUNT_RLIMIT_NPROC, rlimit(RLIMIT_NPROC)) &&
-	    (current_ucounts() != &init_ucounts) &&
-	    !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
+	if ((current->flags & PF_NPROC_CHECK) && is_nproc_overlimit()) {
 		retval = -EAGAIN;
 		goto out_ret;
 	}
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
index b6ecb9fc4cd2..b682131c52fa 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -742,4 +742,6 @@ static inline unsigned long rlimit_max(unsigned int limit)
 	return task_rlimit_max(current, limit);
 }
 
+extern bool is_nproc_overlimit(void);
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_SCHED_SIGNAL_H */
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 79661678a5bf..a18f15053e22 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1891,6 +1891,23 @@ static void copy_oom_score_adj(u64 clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
 	mutex_unlock(&oom_adj_mutex);
 }
 
+static bool is_task_nproc_overlimit(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	struct ucounts *ucounts = task_ucounts(task);
+	/* clone does not change RLIMIT_NPROC. The parents value is safe. */
+	unsigned long limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_NPROC);
+
+	return is_ucounts_overlimit(ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_NPROC, limit) &&
+		(ucounts != &init_ucounts) &&
+		!has_capability(task, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) &&
+		!has_capability(task, CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
+}
+
+bool is_nproc_overlimit(void)
+{
+	return is_task_nproc_overlimit(current);
+}
+
 /*
  * This creates a new process as a copy of the old one,
  * but does not actually start it yet.
@@ -2028,12 +2045,8 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
 	retval = -EAGAIN;
 	if (inc_rlimit_ucounts(task_ucounts(p), UCOUNT_RLIMIT_NPROC, 1) == LONG_MAX)
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_count;
-	if (is_ucounts_overlimit(task_ucounts(p), UCOUNT_RLIMIT_NPROC, rlimit(RLIMIT_NPROC))) {
-		if ((task_ucounts(p) != &init_ucounts) &&
-		    !has_capability(p, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) &&
-		    !has_capability(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
-			goto bad_fork_cleanup_count;
-	}
+	if (is_task_nproc_overlimit(p))
+		goto bad_fork_cleanup_count;
 	current->flags &= ~PF_NPROC_CHECK;
 
 	/*
-- 
2.29.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-11  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-07 12:17 [RFC PATCH 0/6] RLIMIT_NPROC in ucounts fixups Michal Koutný
2022-02-07 12:17 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] set_user: Perform RLIMIT_NPROC capability check against new user credentials Michal Koutný
2022-02-10  1:14   ` Solar Designer
2022-02-10  1:57     ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11 20:32     ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-12 22:14       ` Solar Designer
2022-02-15 11:55     ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-07 12:17 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] set*uid: Check RLIMIT_PROC against new credentials Michal Koutný
2022-02-07 12:17 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] cred: Count tasks by their real uid into RLIMIT_NPROC Michal Koutný
2022-02-07 12:17 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] ucounts: Allow root to override RLIMIT_NPROC Michal Koutný
2022-02-10  0:21   ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-07 12:17 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] selftests: Challenge RLIMIT_NPROC in user namespaces Michal Koutný
2022-02-10  1:22   ` Shuah Khan
2022-02-15  9:45     ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-07 12:18 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] selftests: Test RLIMIT_NPROC in clone-created " Michal Koutný
2022-02-10  1:25   ` Shuah Khan
2022-02-15  9:34     ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-08 13:54 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] RLIMIT_NPROC in ucounts fixups Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11  2:01 ` [PATCH 0/8] ucounts: RLIMIT_NPROC fixes Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11  2:13   ` [PATCH 1/8] ucounts: Fix RLIMIT_NPROC regression Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-14 18:37     ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-16 15:22       ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11  2:13   ` [PATCH 2/8] ucounts: Fix set_cred_ucounts Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-15 11:10     ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-11  2:13   ` [PATCH 3/8] ucounts: Fix and simplify RLIMIT_NPROC handling during setuid()+execve Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-12 23:17     ` Solar Designer
2022-02-14 15:10       ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-14 17:43         ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-15 10:25         ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-16 15:35           ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11  2:13   ` [PATCH 4/8] ucounts: Only except the root user in init_user_ns from RLIMIT_NPROC Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-15 10:54     ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-16 15:41       ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11  2:13   ` [PATCH 5/8] ucounts: Handle wrapping in is_ucounts_overlimit Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-12 22:36     ` Solar Designer
2022-02-14 15:23       ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-14 15:23         ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-15 11:25         ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-14 17:16       ` David Laight
2022-02-11  2:13   ` [PATCH 6/8] ucounts: Handle inc_rlimit_ucounts wrapping in fork Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11 11:34     ` Alexey Gladkov
2022-02-11 17:50       ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11 18:32         ` Shuah Khan
2022-02-11 18:40         ` Alexey Gladkov
2022-02-11 19:56           ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11  2:13   ` [PATCH 7/8] rlimit: For RLIMIT_NPROC test the child not the parent for capabilites Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11  2:13   ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2022-02-11 18:22   ` [PATCH 0/8] ucounts: RLIMIT_NPROC fixes Shuah Khan
2022-02-11 19:23     ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-15 11:37     ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-16 15:56   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-16 15:58     ` [PATCH v2 1/5] rlimit: Fix RLIMIT_NPROC enforcement failure caused by capability calls in set_user Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-16 17:42       ` Solar Designer
2022-02-16 15:58     ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ucounts: Enforce RLIMIT_NPROC not RLIMIT_NPROC+1 Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-16 15:58     ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ucounts: Base set_cred_ucounts changes on the real user Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-16 15:58     ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ucounts: Move RLIMIT_NPROC handling after set_user Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-16 15:58     ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ucounts: Handle wrapping in is_ucounts_overlimit Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-16 17:28       ` Shuah Khan
2022-02-18 15:34     ` [GIT PULL] ucounts: RLIMIT_NPROC fixes for v5.17 Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-20 19:05       ` pr-tracker-bot
2022-03-03  0:12       ` [GIT PULL] ucounts: Regression fix " Eric W. Biederman
2022-03-03  0:30         ` pr-tracker-bot
2022-02-12 15:32 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] RLIMIT_NPROC in ucounts fixups Etienne Dechamps
2022-02-15 10:11   ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-23  0:57     ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-23 18:00       ` How should rlimits, suid exec, and capabilities interact? Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-23 19:44         ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-02-23 21:28           ` Willy Tarreau
2022-02-23 19:50         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-24  1:24           ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-24  1:41             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-24  2:12               ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-24 15:41                 ` [PATCH] ucounts: Fix systemd LimigtNPROC with private users regression Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-24 16:28                   ` Kees Cook
2022-02-24 18:53                     ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-25  0:29                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-24  3:00               ` How should rlimits, suid exec, and capabilities interact? David Laight
2022-02-24  1:32           ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220211021324.4116773-8-ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=legion@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=solar@openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).