From: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Cc: Jung Daehwan <dh10.jung@samsung.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<quic_udipto@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: usb: host: Reduce xhci_handshake timeout in xhci_reset
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:16:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220211064630.GA20567@hu-pkondeti-hyd.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496c9d86-70d7-1050-5bbb-9f841e4b464a@intel.com>
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:49:00AM +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 28.6.2021 9.55, Jung Daehwan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 08:53:02AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:25:48AM +0900, Jung Daehwan wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:56:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:24:56PM +0900, Daehwan Jung wrote:
> >>>>> It seems 10 secs timeout is too long in general case. A core would wait for
> >>>>> 10 secs without doing other task and it can be happended on every device.
> >>>>
> >>>> Only if the handshake does not come back sooner, right?
> >>>
> >>> Yes, right.
> >>>
> >>>> What is causing your device to timeout here?
> >>>
> >>> Host Controller doesn't respond handshake. I don't know why and I ask HW team
> >>> to debug it.
> >>
> >> Please work to fix your hardware, that feels like the root of the
> >> problem here. If you require the timeout for xhci_reset() to happen,
> >> then how do you know that the hardware really did reset properly in the
> >> reduced amount of time you just provided?
> >>
> >
> > I continue fixing this issue with hardware engineer, but currently just
> > host controller can crash whole system and that's why I want to fix it.
> > How about adding some error logs in this situation for recognizing this issue?
> > We can add error log in xhci_stop as xhci_reset can returns error like below.
> >
> > static void xhci_stop(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> > {
> > u32 temp;
> > struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
> > + int ret;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&xhci->mutex);
> >
> > @@ -733,6 +734,9 @@ static void xhci_stop(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> > xhci->cmd_ring_state = CMD_RING_STATE_STOPPED;
> > xhci_halt(xhci);
> > xhci_reset(xhci);
> > + if (ret)
> > + xhci_err(xhci, "%s: Error while reset xhci Host controller - ret = %d\n"
> > + , __func__, ret);
> > spin_unlock_irq(&xhci->lock);
> >
>
> We can check the xhci_reset() return value here and print a message, makes sense.
>
> The original reason for the 10 second timeout was because a host actually took 9 seconds:
>
> commit 22ceac191211cf6688b1bf6ecd93c8b6bf80ed9b
>
> xhci: Increase reset timeout for Renesas 720201 host.
>
> The NEC/Renesas 720201 xHCI host controller does not complete its reset
> within 250 milliseconds. In fact, it takes about 9 seconds to reset the
> host controller, and 1 second for the host to be ready for doorbell
> rings. Extend the reset and CNR polling timeout to 10 seconds each.
>
Agreed.
We also run into the similar issue (very very rarely reproduced) on
our platforms like SM8450. The issue happens when host mode is de-activated
(type-c cable disconnected). Since xhci_reset() is called with interrupts
disabled, a timeout of 10 seconds is fatal to the system.
Thanks,
Pavan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-11 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20210622113915epcas2p284c61291fc9d83487f6dfebb65fd4e9b@epcas2p2.samsung.com>
2021-06-22 11:24 ` usb: host: Reduce xhci_handshake timeout in xhci_reset Daehwan Jung
2021-06-22 19:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-28 2:25 ` Jung Daehwan
2021-06-28 6:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-28 6:55 ` Jung Daehwan
2021-06-28 7:49 ` Mathias Nyman
2022-02-11 6:46 ` Pavan Kondeti [this message]
2022-02-11 7:43 ` Pavan Kondeti
2022-02-14 4:08 ` Pavan Kondeti
2022-02-14 5:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-02-14 5:52 ` Pavan Kondeti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220211064630.GA20567@hu-pkondeti-hyd.qualcomm.com \
--to=quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com \
--cc=dh10.jung@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=quic_udipto@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).