linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Cc: Jung Daehwan <dh10.jung@samsung.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<quic_udipto@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: usb: host: Reduce xhci_handshake timeout in xhci_reset
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:16:30 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220211064630.GA20567@hu-pkondeti-hyd.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496c9d86-70d7-1050-5bbb-9f841e4b464a@intel.com>

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:49:00AM +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 28.6.2021 9.55, Jung Daehwan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 08:53:02AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:25:48AM +0900, Jung Daehwan wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:56:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 08:24:56PM +0900, Daehwan Jung wrote:
> >>>>> It seems 10 secs timeout is too long in general case. A core would wait for
> >>>>> 10 secs without doing other task and it can be happended on every device.
> >>>>
> >>>> Only if the handshake does not come back sooner, right?
> >>>
> >>> Yes, right.
> >>>
> >>>> What is causing your device to timeout here?
> >>>
> >>> Host Controller doesn't respond handshake. I don't know why and I ask HW team
> >>> to debug it.
> >>
> >> Please work to fix your hardware, that feels like the root of the
> >> problem here.  If you require the timeout for xhci_reset() to happen,
> >> then how do you know that the hardware really did reset properly in the
> >> reduced amount of time you just provided?
> >>
> > 
> > I continue fixing this issue with hardware engineer, but currently just
> > host controller can crash whole system and that's why I want to fix it.
> > How about adding some error logs in this situation for recognizing this issue?
> > We can add error log in xhci_stop as xhci_reset can returns error like below.
> > 
> > static void xhci_stop(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> > {
> >         u32 temp;
> >         struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
> > +       int ret;
> > 
> >         mutex_lock(&xhci->mutex);
> > 
> > @@ -733,6 +734,9 @@ static void xhci_stop(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> >         xhci->cmd_ring_state = CMD_RING_STATE_STOPPED;
> >         xhci_halt(xhci);
> >         xhci_reset(xhci);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               xhci_err(xhci, "%s: Error while reset xhci Host controller - ret = %d\n"
> > +                       , __func__, ret);
> >         spin_unlock_irq(&xhci->lock);
> > 
> 
> We can check the xhci_reset() return value here and print a message, makes sense.
> 
> The original reason for the 10 second timeout was because a host actually took 9 seconds:
> 
> commit 22ceac191211cf6688b1bf6ecd93c8b6bf80ed9b
> 
>     xhci: Increase reset timeout for Renesas 720201 host.
>     
>     The NEC/Renesas 720201 xHCI host controller does not complete its reset
>     within 250 milliseconds.  In fact, it takes about 9 seconds to reset the
>     host controller, and 1 second for the host to be ready for doorbell
>     rings.  Extend the reset and CNR polling timeout to 10 seconds each.
> 
Agreed.

We also run into the similar issue (very very rarely reproduced) on
our platforms like SM8450. The issue happens when host mode is de-activated
(type-c cable disconnected). Since xhci_reset() is called with interrupts
disabled, a timeout of 10 seconds is fatal to the system.

Thanks,
Pavan

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-11  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20210622113915epcas2p284c61291fc9d83487f6dfebb65fd4e9b@epcas2p2.samsung.com>
2021-06-22 11:24 ` usb: host: Reduce xhci_handshake timeout in xhci_reset Daehwan Jung
2021-06-22 19:56   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-28  2:25     ` Jung Daehwan
2021-06-28  6:53       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-28  6:55         ` Jung Daehwan
2021-06-28  7:49           ` Mathias Nyman
2022-02-11  6:46             ` Pavan Kondeti [this message]
2022-02-11  7:43               ` Pavan Kondeti
2022-02-14  4:08                 ` Pavan Kondeti
2022-02-14  5:22                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-02-14  5:52                     ` Pavan Kondeti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220211064630.GA20567@hu-pkondeti-hyd.qualcomm.com \
    --to=quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com \
    --cc=dh10.jung@samsung.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=quic_udipto@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).