From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49846C433F5 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239741AbiBOPL6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:11:58 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:53280 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239713AbiBOPLp (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:11:45 -0500 Received: from elvis.franken.de (elvis.franken.de [193.175.24.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98F5DF9A for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:11:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1nJzUH-0001XZ-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:11:29 +0100 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B0FB9C24F4; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:03:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:03:00 +0100 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: kernel test robot , kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: arch/mips/sibyte/common/sb_tbprof.c:515:23: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) Message-ID: <20220215150300.GA23034@alpha.franken.de> References: <202202130432.4tPqXRgn-lkp@intel.com> <20220214080429.GA18136@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220214080429.GA18136@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:04:29AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Thomas, can you find someone who cares about the sibyte support to > fix up the address space annotations in this code? I'll have a look. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]