linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Li <ashimida@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH v2] AARCH64: Add gcc Shadow Call Stack support
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:59:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202202251258.DB0F403B@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72kXoonDYk095XvBwEtRCRNECd1iQOqJHE2cNcgLyUMfcQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 09:47:19PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:24 AM Dan Li <ashimida@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > +         - Clang (https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ShadowCallStack.html)
> > +         - GCC (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Instrumentation-Options.html#Instrumentation-Options)
> 
> Maybe Clang: and GCC: instead of the parenthesis?
> 
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
> > +#define __noscs __attribute__((__no_sanitize__("shadow-call-stack")))
> > +#endif
> 
> Since both compilers have it, and I guess the `#ifdef` condition would
> work for both, could this be moved into `compiler_types.h` where the
> empty `__noscs` definition is, and remove the one from
> `compiler-clang.h`?

I thought about that too, but I think it's less simple due to the
__has_feature vs CONFIG differences, etc:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202202251243.1E38256F9@keescook/

But maybe __has_feature doesn't really matter here?

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-25 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-25  3:24 [PATCH] [PATCH v2] AARCH64: Add gcc Shadow Call Stack support Dan Li
2022-02-25 20:47 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-02-25 20:59   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-02-26  1:27     ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-02-28  7:37   ` Dan Li
2022-02-28 22:35     ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-03-01  0:31       ` Dan Li
2022-03-01 20:11         ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-03-01  9:28       ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-03-01 15:16         ` David Laight
2022-02-25 20:58 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-28  7:50   ` Dan Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202202251258.DB0F403B@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ashimida@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).